Arkansas House Bill HB1714

Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/25
• Refer: 3/10/25
• Report Pass: 3/12/25
• Engrossed: 3/17/25
• Refer: 3/17/25
• Refer: 4/2/25
• Failed: 5/5/25

Caption

To Amend The Definition Of Paid Canvasser.

Impact

The implications of HB 1714 are significant as it alters the existing legal framework that governs signature collection for local option elections. By providing a broader definition of what constitutes a paid canvasser, the bill could potentially increase scrutiny and regulation of petition drives. This could impact grassroots movements that rely on volunteers and paid canvassers to gather support for various initiatives, as it formalizes the conditions under which canvassers can be compensated. The bill's amendments may lead to changes in how organizations allocate budgetary resources for campaigning efforts that involve signature collection.

Summary

House Bill 1714 proposes amendments to the definition of a 'paid canvasser' under Arkansas law, specifically concerning local option elections. This bill seeks to clarify who qualifies as a paid canvasser by expanding the criteria that determine payment for services rendered in soliciting signatures for petitions. The bill aims to include various items of value, such as reimbursement for food, lodging, travel, or any other expenses related to the task of signature collection. This adjustment intends to address the nuances of compensation beyond mere monetary payments, thereby ensuring more comprehensive regulation of canvassing activities in the state.

Contention

While the intent of HB 1714 is to regulate the actions of paid canvassers transparently, it may face opposition from those who argue it imposes unnecessary restrictions on the ability to gather signatures for local initiatives. Critics may contend that the detailed stipulations regarding compensation could hinder community efforts to engage citizens in local democracy, creating barriers for grassroots campaigns. Furthermore, there are concerns that the bill could lead to reduced participation in civic engagement activities, as detailed regulations could complicate the signature gathering process for potential activists.