Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1779

Introduced
3/13/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Report Pass
3/20/25  
Engrossed
3/31/25  
Refer
3/31/25  
Report Pass
4/7/25  
Enrolled
4/14/25  
Enrolled
4/15/25  
Chaptered
4/17/25  

Caption

To Amend The Law Related To Theft Of Property; And Enhance The Offense Classification For The Theft Of A Postal Package Delivered To A Person's Residence And Left Within The Curtilage Of The Residence.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1779 will amend Arkansas Code § 5-36-103, which governs theft classifications in the state. The change in law specifically addresses theft involving postal packages, reflecting a shift in legislative focus to protect homeowners and deter property crimes associated with delivery services. By heightening the penalties for stealing these packages, the bill aims to enhance the deterrent effect against such crimes, signalling a stronger stance on property protection. The potential ramifications include not only stricter legal accountability for offenders but also increased safety and satisfaction for residents receiving deliveries.

Summary

House Bill 1779 aims to amend existing laws related to property theft by specifically enhancing the classification of theft offenses associated with postal packages. The bill focuses on penalizing individuals who unlawfully take postal packages that have been delivered to a person's residence and left within the property’s curtilage. By doing so, it recognizes the increasing concern around package theft, which has become more prevalent due to the rise of online shopping. The bill modifies the offense classification for such thefts, potentially categorizing them as Class D felonies, thereby carrying more serious legal consequences for offenders.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards HB 1779 appears to be largely positive among supporters who see it as a necessary measure to combat an escalating issue in society—package theft. Lawmakers and community advocates emphasize the importance of protecting residents' deliveries and ensuring that those who commit such property crimes face more severe penalties. However, there could also be concerns expressed by civil liberties groups regarding the implications of enhanced penalties on individuals who may be swept up by more stringent theft laws, indicating a nuanced debate around the bill's implications.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 1779 concern the broader implications of establishing stricter theft classifications. While supporters argue that increased penalties for package theft will deter crime, opponents may voice concerns about whether the bill does enough to address underlying issues of economic hardship that contribute to theft-related offenses. Additionally, the focus on packages left on private property may also spark discussions on privacy, property rights, and how law enforcement approaches such cases, emphasizing the need for balance between deterrence and fair judicial process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB562

Property taxation: exemption: principal residence: veterans and their unmarried surviving spouses.

MS SB2194

Stolen property; create crime for the sale of and require payment made to the owner of the property.

MS HB1374

Stolen property; create crime for the sale of and require payment made to the owner of the property.

MS HB392

Stolen property; create crime for the sale of and require payment made to the owner of the property.

SC S0159

Organized Retail Crime

SC H3523

Organized Retail Crime

SC S0057

Provide Penalties for Hate Crimes

MS SB2100

Receiving stolen property; revise the crime of.