Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1895

Introduced
3/31/25  
Refer
3/31/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Engrossed
4/7/25  
Refer
4/7/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Enrolled
4/15/25  
Chaptered
4/17/25  

Caption

To Allow A Corporation Or Voluntary Association To Employ In-house Attorneys To Represent Affiliates Of The Corporation Or Voluntary Association.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1895 would modify Arkansas Code § 16-22-211, which currently prohibits corporations and voluntary associations from practicing law in certain contexts. By allowing in-house attorneys to represent affiliates, the bill could streamline legal processes for corporations, thereby reducing reliance on external law firms and potentially lowering legal costs. This change may lead to a shift in how corporations manage their legal affairs, empowering them to address legal challenges more efficiently and cohesively within their operated structures.

Summary

House Bill 1895 seeks to amend the existing laws concerning the prohibition against corporations or voluntary associations practicing law by explicitly permitting them to employ in-house attorneys. This change will allow these entities to represent their affiliates in legal matters, offering a more flexible approach to legal representation within corporate structures. The bill clarifies that affiliates include any related corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, or voluntary associations, broadening the scope of legal representation that can be provided internally.

Sentiment

Discussions around HB 1895 reflected a generally positive sentiment, particularly among proponents who argue that it enhances corporate autonomy and allows for better legal resource management. Supporters believe that enabling corporations to have their legal counsel will improve the efficacy of legal proceedings and provide a better framework for affiliate operations. However, there are concerns regarding the implications of allowing corporations to handle legal representation internally, which critics argue could lead to reduced oversight and accountability in legal practices.

Contention

Despite the positive reception, there is some contention regarding the implications of the bill on the practice of law in Arkansas. Critics worry that the broadened scope for corporations and associations could undermine the role of licensed attorneys in ensuring ethical legal representation. There are fears that companies might prioritize profit over adherence to legal standards when employing in-house counsel, potentially leading to conflicts of interest and jeopardizing the integrity of the legal profession.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB511

Personal income taxes: voluntary contributions: California ALS Research Network Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA AB133

Property tax postponement.

CA AB2096

Personal income taxes: voluntary contributions: Organ and Tissue Donor Registry Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA SB813

Franchise Tax Board: voluntary disclosure agreements.

CA SB1363

Personal income taxes: voluntary contributions: National Alliance on Mental Illness California Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA SB1036

Voluntary carbon offsets: business regulation.

CA AB2944

Personal income taxes: voluntary contributions: Schools Not Prisons Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA AB1926

Voluntary declaration of parentage.