Arkansas House Bill HJR1010

Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/25
• Refer: 2/10/25
• Failed: 5/5/25

Caption

A Constitutional Amendment To Provide That By A Two-thirds Vote, The Senate May Remove Members Of Certain Boards And Commissions For Cause Only, After Notice And Hearing.

Impact

The HJR1010 amendment would significantly revise the existing removal procedures outlined in the Arkansas Constitution. Currently, the Governor holds the authority to remove board members; this amendment would add a layer of Senate involvement, allowing for broader legislative input in these decisions. The amendment would not supplant existing removal authority but serve as a supplementary method, likely resulting in a more thorough review process when assessing the conduct of board members. This could lead to increased scrutiny and ensure that board members' actions align with the public interest.

Summary

HJR1010 proposes an amendment to the Arkansas Constitution that allows the Senate to remove members of certain boards and commissions for cause only, requiring a two-thirds majority vote after notice and hearing. This amendment aims to enhance the Senate's oversight and accountability in managing appointed members who serve on various commission boards, thereby increasing legislative control over executive appointments. The proposed changes intend to provide a structured process that balances the powers of both the legislative and executive branches in Arkansas.

Contention

There may be notable contention surrounding this amendment, with potential pushback from stakeholders who may view the Senate's power to remove members as an encroachment on the Governor's executive powers. Critics might argue that this could lead to political maneuvering rather than promoting accountability, while supporters would assert that it fortifies the democratic process by allowing elected officials to maintain oversight of appointed positions. Debate is likely to focus on the balance of power between the Senate and the Governor's office, as well as the implications for governance and public trust in state institutions.