Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas Senate Bill SB146

Introduced
1/30/25  
Refer
1/30/25  
Report Pass
2/4/25  
Engrossed
2/5/25  
Refer
2/5/25  
Report Pass
2/12/25  
Enrolled
2/13/25  
Chaptered
2/18/25  

Caption

To Amend The Definition Of "recreational Purpose" As Used In Relation To The Liability Of A Property Owner Who Makes Land Available To The Public For Recreational Purposes.

Impact

If enacted, SB146 is likely to provide stronger legal protections for property owners opening their land to the public for recreational uses. By defining a wider array of recreational activities, the bill aims to encourage landowners to permit public access, which can contribute to the enhancement of public areas and increased recreational opportunities. This change is expected to foster outdoor activities within the state while balancing the interests between property owners and the public's need for accessible recreational spaces.

Summary

Senate Bill 146 (SB146) proposes amendments to the definition of 'recreational purpose' concerning the liability of property owners who provide land for public recreational use. The bill extends the existing legal framework that limits property owners' liability when individuals engage in activities such as hunting, fishing, camping, and hiking on their land. The revised definition is intended to encompass a broader range of activities, which may enhance community engagement with natural spaces and promote outdoor recreational opportunities for the public.

Sentiment

The legislative sentiment surrounding SB146 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, as indicated by the unanimous vote of 98-0 during its third reading. Proponents of the bill argue that it will benefit both property owners and the community by promoting outdoor engagements without the fear of excessive litigation against landowners. Such support reflects a consensus on the importance of increasing public access to recreational areas, which can significantly contribute to public health and community well-being.

Contention

While the bill has garnered broad support, some potential points of contention may arise around the scope of the activities defined as 'recreational purposes.' Opponents might raise concerns about liability in the event of injuries on property used for more extreme recreational activities, such as rock climbing or winter sports. There could also be discussions regarding the balance between increasing recreational opportunities and ensuring that local land use regulations and safety standards remain intact. As the bill progresses, it will be critical to address these issues to mitigate any unintended consequences while enhancing access to recreational land.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.