Arkansas Senate Bill SB298

Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/25
• Refer: 2/25/25
• Report Pass: 3/5/25
• Engrossed: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Report Pass: 3/11/25
• Enrolled: 3/13/25
• Chaptered: 3/18/25
• Passed: 3/18/25

Caption

To Repeal The Law Concerning The Setting Aside Of A Decree To Quiet Title To Land To Allow For Finality In Quiet Title Actions.

Impact

The repealing of this law would significantly impact property law and disputes over land titles in Arkansas. Supporters of the bill argue that such a change would create a more definitive and stable environment for property ownership, reducing the possibility for ongoing challenges to property deeds that have already been legally adjudicated. This move is seen as a means to enhance real estate transactions and foster confidence in property investments, as buyers would be assured that once a title is quieted, it remains protected from subsequent challenges.

Summary

Senate Bill 298 aims to repeal the existing law that permits individuals to set aside a decree in quiet title actions within a specific timeframe. The current Arkansas Code allows any person to request the setting aside of a quiet title decree within three years by filing a meritorious defense, including provisions for those with disabilities to do so any time within three years of their eligibility. By repealing this statute, the bill seeks to establish legal finality in quiet title actions, which could alter how property rights are contested in Arkansas.

Contention

Despite its intended legal clarity, the repeal has raised concerns among advocates for individuals facing property disputes. Opponents argue that this change may diminish the rights of those who may have legitimate claims but are unable to contest a decree within the established timeframe. The removal of this provision is seen as potentially disadvantaging vulnerable groups, including those with disabilities or limited access to legal resources, who may need additional time to protect their property interests. Thus, while the bill seeks to streamline legal processes, it also invites debate regarding the balance between efficiency and fair access to justice in property law.