Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas Senate Bill SB384

Introduced
3/5/25  
Refer
3/5/25  
Report Pass
3/12/25  
Engrossed
3/13/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Report Pass
3/20/25  
Enrolled
4/2/25  
Chaptered
4/7/25  

Caption

To Repeal The Requirement That The Arkansas Development Finance Authority Submit A Program Fact Sheet To The Legislative Council And Arkansas Legislative Audit For Each New Bond Issue.

Impact

If enacted, SB384 would directly influence the process of bond issuance in Arkansas by removing a layer of legislative oversight. Currently, the submission of program fact sheets serves to inform legislative bodies and the public about the details of new bond issues, including fees and interest rates. By repealing this requirement, the bill could potentially diminish transparency regarding state finances, particularly in how public funds are managed through bond offerings.

Summary

Senate Bill 384 aims to repeal the requirement that the Arkansas Development Finance Authority (ADFA) submit a program fact sheet to the Legislative Council and Arkansas Legislative Audit for each new bond issue. The significance of this bill lies in its intention to reduce regulatory burdens on the ADFA, enabling it to streamline the bond issuance process by eliminating the need for additional reporting. Supporters of the bill argue that this will enhance efficiency and allow the ADFA to manage bond issues more flexibly, without the constraints of administrative oversight.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB384 appears to be mixed. Proponents advocate for the reduction of bureaucratic processes that can slow down financial operations, emphasizing that the ADFA should be trusted to manage its own bond issues without extensive legislative scrutiny. Conversely, critics express concerns over the potential for diminished transparency and accountability in state financial dealings, arguing that such oversight is crucial for public trust and sound governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions of SB384 revolve around the balance between efficiency and accountability in public finance management. Supporters argue that administrative burdens hinder the ADFA's ability to operate effectively and respond to market conditions, while opponents contend that eliminating the program fact sheet requirement may lead to less informed decision-making regarding state finance, with the risk of mismanagement of public funds. This debate highlights the ongoing tension between fostering a business-friendly environment and maintaining robust oversight to ensure public resources are used judiciously.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.