Arkansas Senate Bill SB387

Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/25
• Refer: 3/5/25
• Report Pass: 3/12/25
• Engrossed: 3/13/25
• Refer: 3/13/25
• Report Pass: 3/20/25
• Enrolled: 4/2/25
• Chaptered: 4/7/25
• Passed: 4/7/25

Caption

To Repeal The Law Requiring Occupational Licensing Entities To Submit A Report Concerning The Number Of Individuals Granted Automatic Occupational Licensure And Expedited Occupational Licensure.

Impact

If enacted, SB387 would eliminate a specific reporting obligation that entails the collection and distribution of data about individuals who receive automatic or expedited licensure. This could have significant implications for regulatory oversight, as comprehensive data collection helps to ensure accountability and monitor the effectiveness of occupational licensing policies. While proponents view this as a step toward modernization and efficiency, critics might argue that it could hinder transparency regarding the licensing process.

Summary

Senate Bill 387 aims to amend existing laws concerning occupational licensing by repealing the requirement for occupational licensing entities to submit a report detailing the number of individuals granted automatic and expedited occupational licensure. This change reflects a move towards reducing bureaucratic reporting requirements for state agencies managing these licensing processes. The bill primarily targets the administrative burdens placed on licensing entities and seeks to streamline operations, making it more efficient for both the agencies and individuals seeking licenses.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB387 appears to be supportive amongst legislators who value efficiency and deregulation. Advocates highlight the potential for reduced administrative overhead and a more agile response to licensing needs within industries. However, there could also be dissenting opinions from those who prioritize accountability and oversight in occupational licensing, indicating a dichotomy in how the changes could be perceived among different stakeholder groups.

Contention

Despite its intended efficiency, the bill may face contention related to its potential impact on oversight and the quality of data collected regarding occupational licensure. Some advocates for transparency might express concern that removing the reporting requirement could lead to a lack of information on how well the automatic and expedited licensure processes serve the needs of various professions and the public. This could create arguments about the balance between reducing red tape and maintaining necessary oversight.