Rulemaking; exemption; limitation; corporation commission
If passed, HB2128 would influence how state agencies interact with the rulemaking process by allowing the corporation commission and other select agencies to bypass certain procedural requirements. The bill mandates that if these agencies choose to follow the prescribed requirements of the administrative procedures act, they must make their proposed rule review processes public prior to initiating any rulemaking. This could also mean that the agency could implement rules more quickly, thereby responding faster to changing conditions in their respective sectors.
House Bill 2128 aims to amend Section 41-1057 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, which pertains to administrative procedures and rulemaking exemptions. The bill specifies certain agencies that would be exempt from the general administrative procedures, including the corporation commission when exercising its plenary ratemaking authority. By providing these exemptions, the bill seeks to streamline the rulemaking process for specific state agencies, potentially making them more efficient in their operations and decision-making.
The sentiment surrounding HB2128 appears to be mixed to positive among proponents who argue that the bill will foster greater efficiency in the regulatory environment. Supporters assert that streamlining these processes is essential for effective governance and that it aligns with modern needs. However, concerns persist regarding the lack of oversight and transparency, particularly from critics who worry that exempting certain agencies from standard procedures could lead to less accountability and public scrutiny.
Notable points of contention include fears that the bill may compromise the rigor of rulemaking processes. Critics argue that by allowing exemptions, there is a risk of diminishing the comprehensive regulatory environment intended to protect public interests. The debate centers on balancing the need for efficient governance with the essential oversight that ensures rules are thoroughly vetted and do not adversely impact stakeholders who might be affected by less regulated decisions.