The bill aims to bring greater transparency and accountability to the evaluation of tax credits, which have significant implications for state revenue and economic policy. By instituting a structured review process, HB2219 intends to determine whether tax credits should be maintained, amended, or repealed based on their effectiveness in promoting economic development, job creation, and retention. The measure is designed to have this review occur every five years for each tax credit, enabling legislators to make data-driven decisions regarding tax policies.
Summary
House Bill 2219 establishes a Joint Legislative Income Tax Credit Review Committee in Arizona to evaluate existing income tax credits. This committee will consist of ten members, five from the House Ways and Means Committee and five from the Senate Finance Committee, ensuring a mix of political party representation. The primary function of the committee will be to assess the original purpose of tax credits and to set standards for their evaluation, including their economic impact on the state and any complexities involved in their application and administration.
Conclusion
Overall, House Bill 2219 represents a significant step towards reforming how tax credits are managed and reviewed in Arizona. It aims to streamline processes and ensure that tax incentives serve their intended purposes effectively, fostering economic development while also addressing possible legislative overreach or inefficiencies related to outdated tax benefits.
Contention
While supporters of HB2219 argue that it will improve the effectiveness of tax incentives by fostering regular oversight and eliminating ineffective or unnecessarily complex credits, critics may raise concerns regarding the potential implications for industries that rely on these credits for operational funding. The process of reviewing and potentially repealing credits could disproportionately affect businesses and economic sectors that benefit from these incentives, leading to debates over the balance between fiscal responsibility and economic support.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.