Arizona 2022 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2231

Introduced
1/19/22  
Report Pass
1/25/22  
Report Pass
1/31/22  
Engrossed
2/15/22  
Report Pass
3/9/22  
Report Pass
3/14/22  
Enrolled
4/12/22  
Passed
4/18/22  
Chaptered
4/18/22  

Caption

Universities; water rights adjudication

Impact

The implications of HB 2231 on state laws are significant, particularly in the context of water rights management in Arizona. By permitting universities to engage in these adjudications, the bill aims to bolster the legal support available to smaller landowners who often struggle with water rights issues. This can lead to a more equitable adjudication process, potentially safeguarding the interests of rural communities and their access to essential water resources. The bill also mandates collaboration between the universities and cooperative extension services to strengthen the economic sustainability of these communities.

Summary

House Bill 2231, titled 'Universities; water rights adjudication', seeks to amend the Arizona Revised Statutes concerning the provision of support in the adjudication of water rights. Specifically, the bill allows universities governed by the Arizona Board of Regents to provide pro bono assistance to small landowners involved in the general stream adjudication of water rights. If passed, this legislation emphasizes the institutions' role in facilitating legal representation for claimants who may not have access to legal counsel in specific water rights cases.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2231 appears to be generally positive, especially among advocates for rural communities and farmers who face challenges regarding water rights. Supporters argue that having universities assist with these legal processes is a crucial step towards ensuring fair access to water resources. However, there may be some concerns regarding the universities' capacity and expertise in managing such legal matters effectively, which could lead to debate about the appropriateness of this support structure.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, it may face scrutiny regarding the potential limits of university involvement in legal matters. Critics may question whether universities should be handling legal representation in water rights adjudications, particularly in more contested cases. Furthermore, there may be differing opinions on whether this bill adequately addresses the complexities surrounding water rights in Arizona or if it serves primarily to alleviate burdens on overwhelmed legal systems.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AZ HB2847

Sexual misconduct; universities; community colleges

AZ SB1305

Public universities; posting requirements

AZ HB2357

Watershed health; use; survey

AZ SB1329

Watershed health; survey; use

AZ HB2178

Universities; student fees; clubs; organizations

AZ HB2320

Watersheds; beneficial use; instream flows

AZ SB1360

Ballot processing; electronic adjudication; limitation

AZ HB2657

Parent's rights; mental; physical health

AZ HB2011

Lottery; water infrastructure finance authority

AZ SB1664

DCS; tiered central registry; hearings

Similar Bills

CA AB402

Office of the Claimant Advocate and Stakeholder Advisory Group.

CA SB1384

Labor Commissioner: financially disabled persons: representation.

AZ HB2813

Erroneous convictions; compensation

CA AB401

Employment Development Department: language translations.

AZ SB1500

Compensation; erroneous convictions

CA SB490

Victim compensation.

CA SB530

Exoneration: compensation.

CA SB975

Debt: coerced debts.