California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB530

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Failed
2/1/24  

Caption

Exoneration: compensation.

Impact

If enacted, SB530 will significantly impact the state's legal framework regarding compensation for wrongful convictions. Individuals who have spent time on parole or have been required to register as sex offenders due to wrongful convictions would have the ability to seek compensation beyond their incarceration period. This means that individuals wrongfully convicted, who have faced collateral consequences such as registry requirements, can now claim damages for their suffering. This reform is portrayed as part of broader efforts to address injustices within the legal system of California and to provide relief to those adversely affected by wrongful convictions.

Summary

Senate Bill 530, introduced by Senator Bradford, seeks to amend the California Penal Code concerning compensation for individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. The bill broadens the conditions under which individuals can file claims with the California Victim Compensation Board for compensation related to erroneous convictions, allowing for claims even if the individual was not imprisoned. It introduces provisions that would enable compensation of $140 per day for time served due to wrongful convictions and extends the compensation to include $70 per day for periods on parole or under the Sex Offender Registry as a consequence of an erroneous conviction. Moreover, the bill aims to support individuals in obtaining reasonable attorney fees incurred during the process of exoneration.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB530 appears to be generally supportive among legislators concerned with criminal justice reform and the rights of individuals affected by wrongful convictions. Proponents believe the bill represents overdue justice for wronged individuals and reflects a commitment to rectifying past injustices. However, there may be concerns regarding its budgetary implications and how claims will be managed and funded, especially given the link to General Fund availability and future appropriations. Critics could express worries about potential misuse of expanded claims or the fiscal impact on state resources.

Contention

Notably, one area of contention is the financial logistics of implementing the bill, particularly how appropriations will be allocated to support the compensation claims. The bill stipulates that it becomes operative contingent on the availability of General Fund moneys starting July 1, 2024, which raises concerns about the sustainability of compensation funding. Additionally, the requirement for the Attorney General to meet a clear and convincing evidence threshold when challenging claims introduces complexity into the administration of wrongful conviction claims, which could lead to debates about fairness and due process in resolving such sensitive matters.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB78

Criminal procedure: factual innocence.

CA SB490

Victim compensation.

CA SB141

Public safety trailer bill.

CA AB160

Public safety trailer bill.

CA SB1468

Factual innocence.

CA SB269

Wrongful convictions.

CA SB446

Factual innocence.