Arizona 2022 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2280 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	REFERENCE TITLE: social media; censorship; civil action State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session 2022 HB 2280 Introduced by Representatives Fillmore: Carter, Chaplik AN ACT Amending title 18, arizona revised statutes, by adding chapter 7: relating to information technology. (TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
2	2
3	3
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9	REFERENCE TITLE: social media; censorship; civil action
10	10	State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-fifth Legislature Second Regular Session 2022
11	11	HB 2280
12	12	Introduced by Representatives Fillmore: Carter, Chaplik
13	13
14	14	REFERENCE TITLE: social media; censorship; civil action
15	15
16	16
17	17
18	18
19	19
20	20
21	21
22	22
23	23
24	24	State of Arizona
25	25
26	26	House of Representatives
27	27
28	28	Fifty-fifth Legislature
29	29
30	30	Second Regular Session
31	31
32	32	2022
33	33
34	34
35	35
36	36
37	37
38	38
39	39
40	40	HB 2280
41	41
42	42
43	43
44	44	Introduced by
45	45
46	46	Representatives Fillmore: Carter, Chaplik
47	47
48	48
49	49
50	50
51	51
52	52	AN ACT
53	53
54	54
55	55
56	56	Amending title 18, arizona revised statutes, by adding chapter 7: relating to information technology.
57	57
58	58
59	59
60	60
61	61
62	62	(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
63	63
64	64
65	65
66	66	Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona: Section 1. Title 18, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding chapter 7, to read: CHAPTER 7 SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITES ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS START_STATUTE18-701. Definitions In this article, unless the context otherwise requires: 1. "Algorithm" means a set of instructions designed to perform a specific task. 2. "Harmful to minors" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-3501. 3. "Hate speech" means a phrase concerning content that an INDIVIDUAL finds offensive based on the individual's personal moral code. 4. "OBSCENE material" means content that meets any of the following: (a) when considered or taken as a whole, the average INDIVIDUAL applying contemporary community standards would find appeals to the prurient interest. (b) DEPICTS or DESCRIBES SEXUAL ACTIVITY IN A PATENTLY OFFENSIVE WAY BY AUDIO OR VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS. (c) when considered or taken as a whole, LACKS SERIOUS LITERARY, ARTISTIC, POLITICAL OR SCIENTIFIC VALUE. 5. "Political Speech": (a) means speech RELATING TO THIS STATE, A GOVERNMENT, A BODy POLITIC OR A PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AS THE SPEECH RELATES TO GOVERNMENTAL POLICYMAKING. (b) Includes speech by THE GOVERNMENT OR A CANDIDATE FOR OFFICE AND ANY DISCUSSION OF SOCIAL ISSUES. 6. "Religious speech" means an expression OF A SINCERE AND MEANINGFUL BELIEF THAT ATTEMPTS TO EXPLAIN SUCH GREATER QUESTIONS AS HOW THE WORLD WAS CREATED, WHAT CONSTITUTES RIGHT AND WRONG ACTIONS BY HUMANS AND WHAT HAPPENS AFTER DEATH. 7. "Shadowban" means: (a) The ACT OF BLOCKING OR PARTIALLY BLOCKING A USER OR THE USER'S CONTENT FROM AN ONLINE COMMUNITY SO THAT IT IS NOT READILY APPARENT TO THE USER THAT THE USER HAS BEEN BANNED. (b) STEALTH BANNING, GHOST BANNING OR COMMENT GHOSTING. 8. "Social media website": (a) MEANS an internet website or application that enables users to communicate WITH each other by posting information, comments, MESSAGES or images and that meets all of the following: (i) is open to the public. (ii) has more than seventy-five million subscribers. (iii) From its inception has not been specifically affiliated with any one religion or political party. (iv) PROVIDES A MEANS FOR THE WEBSITE'S USERS TO REPORT OBSCENE MATERIALS AND HAS IN PLACE PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING THOSE REPORTS AND REMOVING OBSCENE MATERIAL. (v) Allows for subscribers to sign up for a personal user profile page. (b) does not include a website that merely allows members of the general public to post comments on content published by the owner of the website. 9. "User profile": (a) means: (i) a collection of settings and information associated with a user or subscriber who signs up for an account made available by a social media website. (ii) AN ACCOUNT THAT ASSOCIATES CHARACTERISTICS WITH A USER OR SUBSCRIBER THAT MAY HELP IN ASCERTAINING THE INTERACTIVE BEHAVIOR OF THE USER ALONG WITH THE user's PERSONAL PREFERENCES AND BELIEFS. (b) INCLUDES THE EXPLICIT DIGITAL REPRESENTATION OF THE IDENTITY OF THE USER OR SUBSCRIBER WITH RESPECT TO THE OPERATING ENVIRONMENT OF A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE. END_STATUTE START_STATUTE18-702. Social media websites; censorship prohibited; damages; costs; attorney general; enforcement; exceptions A. The owner or OPERATOR OF A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE THAT CONTRACTS WITH A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER IN THIS STATE MAY NOT PURPOSELY: 1. DELETE OR CENSOR THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITe USER's RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH. 2. USE AN ALGORITHM TO DISFAVOR, SHADOWBAN OR CENSOR THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER'S RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH. B. THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE THAT VIOLATES SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION IS LIABLE FOR: 1. Up to $75,000 in damages per day. 2. actual damages. 3. punitive damages, IF AGGRAVATING FACTORS ARE PRESENT. 4. other forms of equitable relief. c. a court may award the PREVAILING PARTY IN A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS. D. A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE THAT RESTORES FROM DELETION OR REMOVES THE CENSORING OF THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER'S RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH WITHIN A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME MAY USE THAT FACT TO SEEK MITIGATION OF ANY DAMAGES AWARDED BY THE COURT. E. A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE MAY NOT USE THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER'S ALLEGED HATE SPEECH AS A BASIS FOR JUSTIFICATION OR DEFENSE OF THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE'S ACTIONS AT TRIAL. F. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY BRING A CIVIL ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION ON BEHALF OF A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER WHO RESIDES IN THIS STATE AND WHOSE RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH WAS CENSORED BY A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE. ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE IS AN UNLAWFUL PRACTICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 44-1522. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY INVESTIGATE THE VIOLATION AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 44, CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE 7. G. ONLY A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER WHO IS at least EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE HAS STANDING TO SEEK ENFORCEMENT OF THIS SECTION. H. THE VENUE FOR ANY CIVIL ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE IN THIS STATE. I. This section does not apply to either of the following: 1. A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE THAT DELETES OR CENSORS A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER'S RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH OR THAT USES AN ALGORITHM TO DISFAVOR, SHADOWBAN OR CENSOR SPEECH THAT MEETS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: (a) calls for immediate acts of violence. (b) calls for social media website users to harm themselves. (c) is obscene material or is material harmful to minors. (d) is the result of an operational error. (e) is the result of a court order. (f) comes from an inauthentic source or involves false impersonation. (g) entices criminal conduct. (h) constitutes trademark or copyright infringement. (i) is excessively violent. (j) constitutes harassment of a commercial, but not a religious or political, nature. 2. a social media website user's censoring of another social media website user's religious speech or political speech. END_STATUTE Sec. 2. Applicability This act applies to owners and operators of social media websites that censor social media website users' religious speech and political speech beginning from and after the effective date of this act. Sec. 3. Legislative findings The Legislature finds that: 1. The Communications Decency Act was implemented to protect decent speech, not deceptive trade practices. 2. Repealing section 230 of the Communications Decency Act at the federal level is unnecessary because it already includes a state law exemption and this act is crafted to fall squarely in the state law exemption of section 230 to protect the consumers of this state. 3. Contract law is a state law issue and when citizens of this state sign up to use certain social media websites, they are entering into a contract. 4. This state has a compelling interest in holding certain social media websites to higher standards for having substantially created a digital public square through fraud, false advertising and deceptive trade practices. 5. Major social media websites have engaged in the greatest bait and switch of all times by marketing themselves as free, fair and open to all ideas to induce subscribers, only to then prove otherwise at great expense to consumer and election integrity. 6. Breach of contract, false advertising, bad faith, unfair dealing, fraudulent inducement and deceptive trade practices are not protected forms of speech for the purposes of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or the Constitution of this state. 7. The major social media websites have already reached critical mass and they did through fraud, false advertising and deceptive trade practices at great expense to the health, safety and welfare of consumers of this state, while making it difficult for others to compete with them. 8. This state has an interest in helping its citizens enjoy their free exercise rights in certain semipublic forums commonly used for religious speech and political speech, regardless to which political party or religious organization they ascribe to. 9. This state is generally opposed to online censorship unless the content is injurious to children or promotes human trafficking; only then does this state accept limited censorship. 10. This article is not intended to apply to a social media website that merely deletes comments posted by members of the general public in response to material published by the website's owner. Sec. 4. Purpose This article is intended to create a statute that parallels the spirit of 47 United States Code section 230(e)(3) and that falls within the state law exemption under 47 United States Code section 230(e)(3) and to create a civil action that will deter the following: 1. Deceptive trade practices. 2. False advertising. 3. Breach of contract. 4. Bad faith. 5. Unfair dealing. 6. Fraudulent inducement. 7. The stifling of political speech and religious speech in the modern-day digital public square cultivated by social media websites that have achieved critical mass through fraud. Sec. 5. Severability If a provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provision of this act are severable. Sec. 6. Short title This act may be cited as the "Stop Social Media Censorship Act". Sec. 7. Emergency This act is an emergency measure that is necessary to preserve the public peace, health or safety and is operative immediately as provided by law.
67	67
68	68	Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
69	69
70	70	Section 1. Title 18, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding chapter 7, to read:
71	71
72	72	CHAPTER 7
73	73
74	74	SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITES
75	75
76	76	ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
77	77
78	78	START_STATUTE18-701. Definitions
79	79
80	80	In this article, unless the context otherwise requires:
81	81
82	82	1. "Algorithm" means a set of instructions designed to perform a specific task.
83	83
84	84	2. "Harmful to minors" has the same meaning prescribed in section 13-3501.
85	85
86	86	3. "Hate speech" means a phrase concerning content that an INDIVIDUAL finds offensive based on the individual's personal moral code.
87	87
88	88	4. "OBSCENE material" means content that meets any of the following:
89	89
90	90	(a) when considered or taken as a whole, the average INDIVIDUAL applying contemporary community standards would find appeals to the prurient interest.
91	91
92	92	(b) DEPICTS or DESCRIBES SEXUAL ACTIVITY IN A PATENTLY OFFENSIVE WAY BY AUDIO OR VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS.
93	93
94	94	(c) when considered or taken as a whole, LACKS SERIOUS LITERARY, ARTISTIC, POLITICAL OR SCIENTIFIC VALUE.
95	95
96	96	5. "Political Speech":
97	97
98	98	(a) means speech RELATING TO THIS STATE, A GOVERNMENT, A BODy POLITIC OR A PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AS THE SPEECH RELATES TO GOVERNMENTAL POLICYMAKING.
99	99
100	100	(b) Includes speech by THE GOVERNMENT OR A CANDIDATE FOR OFFICE AND ANY DISCUSSION OF SOCIAL ISSUES.
101	101
102	102	6. "Religious speech" means an expression OF A SINCERE AND MEANINGFUL BELIEF THAT ATTEMPTS TO EXPLAIN SUCH GREATER QUESTIONS AS HOW THE WORLD WAS CREATED, WHAT CONSTITUTES RIGHT AND WRONG ACTIONS BY HUMANS AND WHAT HAPPENS AFTER DEATH.
103	103
104	104	7. "Shadowban" means:
105	105
106	106	(a) The ACT OF BLOCKING OR PARTIALLY BLOCKING A USER OR THE USER'S CONTENT FROM AN ONLINE COMMUNITY SO THAT IT IS NOT READILY APPARENT TO THE USER THAT THE USER HAS BEEN BANNED.
107	107
108	108	(b) STEALTH BANNING, GHOST BANNING OR COMMENT GHOSTING.
109	109
110	110	8. "Social media website":
111	111
112	112	(a) MEANS an internet website or application that enables users to communicate WITH each other by posting information, comments, MESSAGES or images and that meets all of the following:
113	113
114	114	(i) is open to the public.
115	115
116	116	(ii) has more than seventy-five million subscribers.
117	117
118	118	(iii) From its inception has not been specifically affiliated with any one religion or political party.
119	119
120	120	(iv) PROVIDES A MEANS FOR THE WEBSITE'S USERS TO REPORT OBSCENE MATERIALS AND HAS IN PLACE PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING THOSE REPORTS AND REMOVING OBSCENE MATERIAL.
121	121
122	122	(v) Allows for subscribers to sign up for a personal user profile page.
123	123
124	124	(b) does not include a website that merely allows members of the general public to post comments on content published by the owner of the website.
125	125
126	126	9. "User profile":
127	127
128	128	(a) means:
129	129
130	130	(i) a collection of settings and information associated with a user or subscriber who signs up for an account made available by a social media website.
131	131
132	132	(ii) AN ACCOUNT THAT ASSOCIATES CHARACTERISTICS WITH A USER OR SUBSCRIBER THAT MAY HELP IN ASCERTAINING THE INTERACTIVE BEHAVIOR OF THE USER ALONG WITH THE user's PERSONAL PREFERENCES AND BELIEFS.
133	133
134	134	(b) INCLUDES THE EXPLICIT DIGITAL REPRESENTATION OF THE IDENTITY OF THE USER OR SUBSCRIBER WITH RESPECT TO THE OPERATING ENVIRONMENT OF A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE. END_STATUTE
135	135
136	136	START_STATUTE18-702. Social media websites; censorship prohibited; damages; costs; attorney general; enforcement; exceptions
137	137
138	138	A. The owner or OPERATOR OF A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE THAT CONTRACTS WITH A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER IN THIS STATE MAY NOT PURPOSELY:
139	139
140	140	1. DELETE OR CENSOR THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITe USER's RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH.
141	141
142	142	2. USE AN ALGORITHM TO DISFAVOR, SHADOWBAN OR CENSOR THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER'S RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH.
143	143
144	144	B. THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE THAT VIOLATES SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION IS LIABLE FOR:
145	145
146	146	1. Up to $75,000 in damages per day.
147	147
148	148	2. actual damages.
149	149
150	150	3. punitive damages, IF AGGRAVATING FACTORS ARE PRESENT.
151	151
152	152	4. other forms of equitable relief.
153	153
154	154	c. a court may award the PREVAILING PARTY IN A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS.
155	155
156	156	D. A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE THAT RESTORES FROM DELETION OR REMOVES THE CENSORING OF THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER'S RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH WITHIN A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME MAY USE THAT FACT TO SEEK MITIGATION OF ANY DAMAGES AWARDED BY THE COURT.
157	157
158	158	E. A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE MAY NOT USE THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER'S ALLEGED HATE SPEECH AS A BASIS FOR JUSTIFICATION OR DEFENSE OF THE SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE'S ACTIONS AT TRIAL.
159	159
160	160	F. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY BRING A CIVIL ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION ON BEHALF OF A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER WHO RESIDES IN THIS STATE AND WHOSE RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH WAS CENSORED BY A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE. ANY VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE IS AN UNLAWFUL PRACTICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 44-1522. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY INVESTIGATE THE VIOLATION AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 44, CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE 7.
161	161
162	162	G. ONLY A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER WHO IS at least EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE HAS STANDING TO SEEK ENFORCEMENT OF THIS SECTION.
163	163
164	164	H. THE VENUE FOR ANY CIVIL ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE IN THIS STATE.
165	165
166	166	I. This section does not apply to either of the following:
167	167
168	168	1. A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE THAT DELETES OR CENSORS A SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITE USER'S RELIGIOUS SPEECH OR POLITICAL SPEECH OR THAT USES AN ALGORITHM TO DISFAVOR, SHADOWBAN OR CENSOR SPEECH THAT MEETS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
169	169
170	170	(a) calls for immediate acts of violence.
171	171
172	172	(b) calls for social media website users to harm themselves.
173	173
174	174	(c) is obscene material or is material harmful to minors.
175	175
176	176	(d) is the result of an operational error.
177	177
178	178	(e) is the result of a court order.
179	179
180	180	(f) comes from an inauthentic source or involves false impersonation.
181	181
182	182	(g) entices criminal conduct.
183	183
184	184	(h) constitutes trademark or copyright infringement.
185	185
186	186	(i) is excessively violent.
187	187
188	188	(j) constitutes harassment of a commercial, but not a religious or political, nature.
189	189
190	190	2. a social media website user's censoring of another social media website user's religious speech or political speech. END_STATUTE
191	191
192	192	Sec. 2. Applicability
193	193
194	194	This act applies to owners and operators of social media websites that censor social media website users' religious speech and political speech beginning from and after the effective date of this act.
195	195
196	196	Sec. 3. Legislative findings
197	197
198	198	The Legislature finds that:
199	199
200	200	1. The Communications Decency Act was implemented to protect decent speech, not deceptive trade practices.
201	201
202	202	2. Repealing section 230 of the Communications Decency Act at the federal level is unnecessary because it already includes a state law exemption and this act is crafted to fall squarely in the state law exemption of section 230 to protect the consumers of this state.
203	203
204	204	3. Contract law is a state law issue and when citizens of this state sign up to use certain social media websites, they are entering into a contract.
205	205
206	206	4. This state has a compelling interest in holding certain social media websites to higher standards for having substantially created a digital public square through fraud, false advertising and deceptive trade practices.
207	207
208	208	5. Major social media websites have engaged in the greatest bait and switch of all times by marketing themselves as free, fair and open to all ideas to induce subscribers, only to then prove otherwise at great expense to consumer and election integrity.
209	209
210	210	6. Breach of contract, false advertising, bad faith, unfair dealing, fraudulent inducement and deceptive trade practices are not protected forms of speech for the purposes of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or the Constitution of this state.
211	211
212	212	7. The major social media websites have already reached critical mass and they did through fraud, false advertising and deceptive trade practices at great expense to the health, safety and welfare of consumers of this state, while making it difficult for others to compete with them.
213	213
214	214	8. This state has an interest in helping its citizens enjoy their free exercise rights in certain semipublic forums commonly used for religious speech and political speech, regardless to which political party or religious organization they ascribe to.
215	215
216	216	9. This state is generally opposed to online censorship unless the content is injurious to children or promotes human trafficking; only then does this state accept limited censorship.
217	217
218	218	10. This article is not intended to apply to a social media website that merely deletes comments posted by members of the general public in response to material published by the website's owner.
219	219
220	220	Sec. 4. Purpose
221	221
222	222	This article is intended to create a statute that parallels the spirit of 47 United States Code section 230(e)(3) and that falls within the state law exemption under 47 United States Code section 230(e)(3) and to create a civil action that will deter the following:
223	223
224	224	1. Deceptive trade practices.
225	225
226	226	2. False advertising.
227	227
228	228	3. Breach of contract.
229	229
230	230	4. Bad faith.
231	231
232	232	5. Unfair dealing.
233	233
234	234	6. Fraudulent inducement.
235	235
236	236	7. The stifling of political speech and religious speech in the modern-day digital public square cultivated by social media websites that have achieved critical mass through fraud.
237	237
238	238	Sec. 5. Severability
239	239
240	240	If a provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provision of this act are severable.
241	241
242	242	Sec. 6. Short title
243	243
244	244	This act may be cited as the "Stop Social Media Censorship Act".
245	245
246	246	Sec. 7. Emergency
247	247
248	248	This act is an emergency measure that is necessary to preserve the public peace, health or safety and is operative immediately as provided by law.