Arizona 2022 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2629

Introduced
1/31/22  
Report Pass
2/9/22  
Report Pass
2/14/22  
Engrossed
2/18/22  
Report Pass
3/9/22  
Report Pass
3/14/22  
Enrolled
3/22/22  
Passed
3/25/22  
Chaptered
3/25/22  

Caption

Property tax liens; expiration dates

Impact

The legislation introduces a clear notification system for property owners holding tax liens, requiring county treasurers to notify purchasers of impending lien expiration between thirty to sixty days prior to the expiration date. Furthermore, a follow-up notification must be sent within one week after the expiration. This change is anticipated to alleviate confusion for property owners regarding their tax liabilities and the status of their liens, thereby fostering accountability in the tax lien process.

Summary

House Bill 2629 addresses the expiration of property tax liens in Arizona by amending section 42-18127 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. The bill stipulates that if a property tax certificate of purchase is not redeemed and no action is commenced to foreclose the right of redemption within ten years from the date the certificate was issued, the lien will expire, rendering it void. The legislation aims to streamline the process and clarify the timeline regarding the notification of purchasers about impending lien expirations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 2629 appears to be favorable, with recognition of the need for clear guidelines regarding property tax liens. Proponents argue that the bill enhances communication between tax authorities and property owners, thereby preventing potential financial burdens associated with unaddressed tax liens. The legislative discussions reflect an understanding that clearer notification processes can benefit taxpayers and public entities alike, although concerns about the implications of the ten-year period were raised.

Contention

Despite the overall support for HB 2629, some points of contention emerged, particularly regarding the determination of the ten-year limitation. Critics may argue that this period could be too long, allowing substantial time for tax liens to remain unresolved, which could have various impacts on property ownership and investment decisions. Additionally, questions about the adequacy of notifications and how they would be managed in practice may raise concerns about ensuring that all property owners are adequately informed.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.