Arizona 2022 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2709

Introduced
2/7/22  
Report Pass
2/16/22  
Report Pass
2/21/22  
Engrossed
2/24/22  
Report Pass
3/17/22  
Report Pass
3/21/22  
Enrolled
3/28/22  
Passed
3/30/22  
Chaptered
3/30/22  

Caption

Victim's right to privacy; exception

Impact

The amendments proposed by HB 2709 have significant implications for the handling of victims' information in the criminal justice system. Law enforcement agencies and prosecution entities are mandated to redact identifying and locating information from records disclosing details about a criminal case, thereby safeguarding the victim's privacy. However, there are exceptions, including cases where the victim's identity is necessary to protect the constitutional rights of the defendant. This balancing act reflects the law's intention to respect victims' needs while also ensuring fair trials for defendants.

Summary

House Bill 2709 amends section 13-4434 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, aiming to enhance the privacy rights of crime victims. The bill stipulates that victims cannot be compelled to testify about their identifying or locating information in court proceedings unless they consent or a court finds a compelling need for such disclosure. This provision is designed to protect victims from potential re-traumatization during legal processes while maintaining their right to privacy.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 2709 appears to be supportive, particularly from victim advocacy groups and organizations focused on protecting victims' rights. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for fostering a more compassionate and victim-centered approach in the criminal justice system. However, some concern exists regarding the potential for overreach, particularly when courts hold the discretion to disclose information that could define a victim's rights.

Contention

Points of contention include the balance between protecting victims' rights and ensuring defendants' rights to a fair trial. The exceptions allowing court disclosures may create apprehensions among advocates who fear that victims' protections could be compromised in certain judicial scenarios. Discussions also reflect the broader implications for how privacy is protected in the justice system and the potential impact on victim participation in legal proceedings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI SB0723

Criminal procedure: mental capacity; evaluation of competency to waive Miranda rights; require. Amends 1974 PA 258 (MCL 330.1001 - 330.2106) by adding secs. 1080, 1081, 1082 & 1083.

MI HB4738

Criminal procedure: witnesses; confidentiality of certain information of a witness; require prosecuting attorney to maintain, and provide for disclosure in certain circumstances. Amends 1927 PA 175 (MCL 760.1 - 777.69) by adding sec. 40b to ch. VII.

MI HB4739

Crime victims: rights; practice of redacting victim’s contact information; codify. Amends 1985 PA 87 (MCL 780.751 - 780.834) by adding sec. 8a.

HI SB725

Relating To Bail.

HI HB675

Relating To Bail.

AZ SB1556

Cost recovery; contingency fee case

IL HB3045

CRIM CD-VOLUNTARY INTOXICATION

LA HB443

Provides relative to the payment of fines, fees, costs, restitution, and other monetary obligations related to an offender's conviction