Arizona House Bill HB2802

Arizona 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/23
• Report Pass: 2/15/23
• Report Pass: 2/27/23
• Engrossed: 3/2/23
• Report Pass: 3/23/23
• Report Pass: 3/27/23
• Enrolled: 6/14/23
• Vetoed: 6/20/23

Caption

Fentanyl sales; manufacture; sentencing; testing

Impact

The passage of HB 2802 would significantly amend the Arizona Revised Statutes, intensifying the consequences for perpetrators of drug offenses involving fentanyl. The newly defined 'drug-free neighborhood zones' will lead to more stringent regulation and enforcement of drug-related crimes, particularly around sensitive sites such as healthcare facilities and schools. Violations within these zones could lead to harsher sentencing protocols, including increased incarceration times and financial penalties. This legislation aims to establish a clearer framework for law enforcement and judicial proceedings regarding the distribution of fentanyl, ensuring stricter accountability and community safety.

Summary

House Bill 2802 addresses drug offenses related to fentanyl in Arizona. The bill amends existing drug law provisions and introduces a new section that specifically focuses on the sale and distribution of fentanyl within designated drug-free neighborhood zones. The primary goal of this legislation is to enhance penalties for those engaged in fentanyl sales, especially in areas close to institutions like hospitals and schools, which are marked as drug-free zones. The bill reflects a growing concern over the opioid crisis and the increasing prevalence of fentanyl-related incidents across the state. The measures aim to deter drug trafficking and improve community safety.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB 2802 appears to be largely supportive, especially among lawmakers and community advocates concerned about the opioid epidemic’s impact on public health and safety. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step toward combating the fentanyl crisis by enacting stricter penalties, which may serve as a deterrent against drug trafficking. However, some critics express concern about the potential for these heightened penalties to disproportionately affect communities and individuals already struggling with addiction, highlighting the importance of balancing enforcement with support for rehabilitation and preventative measures.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 2802 include debates over the appropriateness of intensified penalties and the effectiveness of drug-free zones as a deterrent strategy. Some lawmakers and community organizations question whether punitive approaches alone will effectively address the complexities of drug addiction and trafficking. There are calls for additional provisions that would support greater access to treatment and addiction recovery services as a complement to the legislative changes. This highlights a division in approach, with some focusing solely on strict enforcement and others advocating for a more holistic strategy involving prevention and treatment.