Arizona 2023 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HCM2006

Introduced
1/25/23  
Report Pass
1/31/23  
Report Pass
2/13/23  
Engrossed
2/21/23  
Report Pass
3/30/23  
Report Pass
4/10/23  

Caption

Urging eradication; salt cedars; waterways

Impact

The intended impact of HCM2006 is substantial, focusing on the ecological health and water management in Arizona. This legislation recognizes the detrimental effects salt cedars have on agriculture, as their dense growth obstructs irrigation systems while consuming large quantities of water. By seeking federal assistance, the bill aims to alleviate the economic pressures faced by agricultural stakeholders while enhancing flood control measures and safeguarding local wildlife. The proposed eradication efforts are intended to support both environmental sustainability and agricultural productivity, which are critical to Arizona’s economy.

Summary

House Concurrent Memorial 2006 (HCM2006) addresses the urgent need for federal support to eradicate salt cedars, also known as tamarisk, in Arizona’s waterways. Introduced in response to the ecological and economic threats posed by this invasive species, the bill seeks to appropriate federal funds and encourage the development of innovative solutions to manage and control the spread of salt cedars. As these trees consume significant amounts of water and disrupt native ecosystems, the bill aims to protect the state’s water resources and restore the health of local habitats.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCM2006 appears to be predominantly supportive among those who recognize the ecological threats posed by salt cedars. Lawmakers generally see the bill as a necessary measure to combat an urgent environmental issue that endangers both natural ecosystems and human infrastructure. However, there may also be concerns regarding the effectiveness and funding of the proposed federal initiatives, as well as the potential challenges in the execution of eradication strategies.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HCM2006 include the challenges inherent in addressing invasive species management and the reliance on federal funding, which may be viewed as uncertain or inadequate by some lawmakers. Critics may question the long-term effectiveness of eradication efforts or raise issues about the methods employed to remove salt cedars without disrupting local ecosystems. As the bill progresses, it will likely prompt discussions about the balance between immediate action against invasive species and the sustainable management of native resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AZ HCM2008

Urging Congress; Antiquities Act; repeal

AZ HCM2006

Federal lands; natural resources; permission

AZ HCM2007

Grand Canyon Footprints monument; repeal

AZ HCM2004

Federal land acquisition; acreage return

AZ SCM1001

National infrastructure bank; urging Congress

AZ HCM2005

Federal lands; transfer to states

AZ HCM2003

Manganese; criteria pollutant; urging EPA

AZ HCM2001

Reevaluate restrictions; chemical industry

AZ SCM1004

Space national guard; urging establishment

AZ SCM1002

Energy rules; urging adoption

Similar Bills

TX SB1670

Relating to the provision of affordable housing in colonias, rural communities, and small municipalities.

CA AB1752

Bees: pesticides: civil penalties.

CA SB493

District agricultural associations: secretary-managers: compensation.

CA AB417

Agriculture and Rural Prosperity Act.

VT H0387

An act relating to administration and enforcement of agricultural water quality requirements

CA AB1733

Secretary of Food and Agriculture: license or registration: bonds.

VT H0146

An act relating to administration and enforcement of agricultural water quality requirements in the State

CA AB933

Food and agriculture omnibus bill.