Arizona 2023 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HCR2016

Introduced

1/19/23

Report Pass

2/15/23

Report Pass

2/27/23

Caption

Article V convention; term limits

Impact

If successfully passed, HCR2016 could significantly alter the political landscape by implementing term limits for members of Congress, thereby potentially leading to a more frequent turnover in national elected officials. Supporters argue that this would promote fresh ideas and reduce the entrenchment of power, which they believe is detrimental to representative democracy. The resolution emphasizes that many citizens in Arizona and other states have previously attempted, through state laws or amendments, to limit congressional terms but faced legal challenges that have undermined these efforts.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 2016 (HCR2016) is a legislative proposal from the Arizona House of Representatives that seeks to apply to the United States Congress to call a convention for the specific purpose of proposing an amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which would establish term limits for members of Congress, specifically United States representatives and senators. This resolution is framed within the context of Article V of the Constitution, which permits states to request such a convention when two-thirds of them concur on a similar amendment proposal.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HCR2016 appears to be supportive among legislators advocating for political reform and responsibility in Congress. Proponents contend that setting term limits is a necessary step to enhance governmental accountability, align representatives' interests closer to those of their constituents, and reduce the likelihood of corruption born from prolonged incumbency. However, there may be skepticism or opposition expressed by some members who view such measures as potentially undermining legislative experience and continuity, showcasing a divide in perspectives on how to effectively govern.

Contention

While the bill is likely to resonate well with constituents frustrated by long-serving politicians, there are noteworthy points of contention regarding its feasibility and implications. Critics may argue that a convention could lead to unintended consequences beyond term limits, as the scope of any proposed amendments remains uncertain. Additionally, there are concerns about the lack of control over a convention's agenda, which could open discussions on various contentious issues that are not suggested by the current resolution. These debates contribute to the complexity of advancing HCR2016 in the legislative process and among public opinion.

Latest HCR2016 Activity

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AJR27

Convention of states for proposing an amendment to the United States Constitution: federal balanced budget.

TX SJR1

Urging the Congress of the United States to propose and submit to the states for ratification a federal balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States and, in the event that Congress does not submit such an amendment on or before December 31, 2011, applying to Congress to call a convention for the specific and exclusive purpose of proposing an amendment to that constitution to provide, in the absence of a national emergency and on a two-thirds vote of Congress, for a federal balanced budget and requesting that the legislatures of each of the several states that compose the United States apply to Congress to call a convention to propose such an amendment.

AL HJR104

RESCINDING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE WHICH REQUEST CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

AL SJR57