Arizona 2023 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1051

Introduced
1/19/23  
Report Pass
2/1/23  
Report Pass
2/7/23  
Engrossed
2/21/23  
Report Pass
3/8/23  
Report Pass
3/13/23  
Enrolled
3/23/23  
Passed
3/28/23  
Chaptered
3/28/23  

Caption

Census adjustment; population threshold

Impact

The bill will directly affect how rural planning areas are established and funded in counties with less than 500,000 residents. By increasing the population threshold, some counties might see a change in how they can maneuver within state law regarding planning and zoning activities, specifically emphasizing voluntary participation in rural areas. This could foster a more cohesive planning process while addressing the transportation excise tax distribution, effectively managing road funding at a county level.

Summary

Senate Bill 1051 introduces amendments to several sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes regarding population thresholds and the establishment of rural planning areas. Specifically, the bill raises the population threshold from 400,000 to 500,000 for counties concerning their ability to form rural planning areas and engage in regional transportation planning. The changes aim to promote voluntary participation and coordination among municipalities sharing a multijurisdictional area and to provide a more structured approach to rural development and planning.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB1051 appears to lean towards positive, mainly from rural advocates who view this as a supportive measure for local governments to address planning needs more efficiently. However, there may be some concerns voiced from urban legislators worried about the implications of such a change, particularly regarding the balance of power between urban and rural interests and ensuring equitable funding distribution.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB1051 could arise from stakeholders who may feel the adjustments to population thresholds could hinder local government autonomy or limit the effectiveness of rural planning efforts. Critics may argue that raising the population threshold may exclude smaller or less populated areas from critical planning advantages that could benefit their communities, thus sparking debates about equitable resource allocation and representation in state planning endeavors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB503

Medi-Cal: managed care plan: subcontracts.

CA AB3197

Contractors: registration: exemption.

CA AB1843

State government.

CA SB877

State Government.

CA AB1727

Public works: fees: small business.

CA SB1180

California Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program.

CA AB1642

Medi-Cal: managed care plans.

CA AB961

Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Program.