The bill mandates the formation of a committee composed of members from both the House and Senate, as well as appointed individuals representing various interests affected by solid and hazardous waste concerns. This collective's findings and recommendations are expected to shape future legislation, potentially leading to increased accountability and oversight in waste management practices. The inclusion of diverse perspectives aims to inform lawmakers about the implications of citizen lawsuits on environmental governance in Arizona.
Summary
SB1692 is a legislative bill aimed at establishing a Solid and Hazardous Waste Citizen Suit Study Committee in Arizona. The primary purpose of this committee is to explore the need for a citizen suit provision within the state's solid waste and hazardous waste statutes. It is designed to engage various stakeholders including members from the legislative body, environmental groups, citizen rights advocates, and representatives from the industrial sector to gather information and make recommendations regarding citizen litigation rights related to waste management issues.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise around the potential for expanded litigation rights, which some stakeholders may view as necessary for enhanced environmental protection, while others might argue it could lead to increased legal disputes and burdens on waste management operations. The balanced composition of the committee suggests a deliberate effort to address these divisive issues, although the discussions and outcomes may reflect differing perspectives on the appropriate regulatory framework for waste management in the state.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.
A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.