Arizona 2023 2023 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1717 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/03/2023

                    Fiscal Note 
 
 
BILL # SB 1717 	TITLE:  dual enrollment; revisions; appropriations 
SPONSOR: Kaiser 	STATUS: Senate Engrossed 
PREPARED BY: Patrick Moran  
 
 
Description 
 
The bill appropriates monies to 4 new programs related to dual enrollment courses.  
 
Estimated Impact 
 
The bill would increase General Fund spending by $25.5 million in FY 2024 based on the appropriations in the bill.  There 
could be additional impacts depending on how many schools would decide to establish new dual enrollment programs or 
to increase participation in existing dual enrollment programs as a result of the bill.  To the extent that the bill does 
induce increased dual enrollment participation, there would also be impacts to community college formula funding.  We 
estimate that every 1% increase in dual enrollment student counts would increase community college formula funding by 
approximately $15,000.   
 
Analysis 
 
Dual enrollment courses are taught by high school teachers who meet the requirements to teach a community college 
course for college credit on a high school campus during normal high school operating hours.  Under state funding 
formulas, dual enrollment students are included in their high school's Average Daily Membership (ADM) counts for K-12 
basic state aid purposes and are simultaneously funded in their community college of attendance at 50% of the level of a 
full-time equivalent student (FTSE).  A.R.S. § 15-1821.01 requires community colleges that establish dual enrollment 
programs to develop a contract with participating districts and charter schools that determines how each dual enrollment 
student is funded, tuition and financial aid policies, and other program requirements. 
 
The bill would establish 4 new programs to increase funding for dual enrollment programs as outlined below. 
 
Dual Enrollment Grant Program 
The bill would establish the Dual Enrollment Grant Program to provide grants to districts and charter schools for 
operation of new dual enrollment programs that are established after July 1, 2023 and appropriates $5.0 million from the 
General Fund for the grants in FY 2024. There is no specific formula established in the bill for distribution of the grants, 
but the bill requires ADE to prioritize applications from schools with FRPL-eligibility of 50% or more.  
 
Dual Enrollment Student Fund 
Under SB 1717, dual enrollment program providers would be eligible for reimbursement of up to $50 per credit hour for 
each grade of C or better earned by a student in a dual enrollment course that fulfills a lower division credit at a university 
or community college or is a career and technical course that results in a certificate, credential, or license.  The bill 
appropriates $15.0 million from the General Fund to cover the cost of the reimbursements.   
 
The Auditor General reports that for state fiscal year 2022, dual enrollment pupils were associated with FTSE counts of 
8,861.  Pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-1401, FTSE is defined as a student who enrolls in 15 community  
 
(Continued)  - 2 - 
 
 
college credit units per semester.  As a result, the 8,861 FTSE level would be associated with total credits on an annual 
basis of 265,830.  (8,861 FTSE X (15 Fall Semester Credits + 15 Spring Semester Credits) = 265,830).   
 
If all credits earned by students currently enrolled in a dual enrollment course received the $50 credit, the total 
expenditures from the fund would be $13.3 million ($50 X 265,830 credit hours = $13.3 million).  The actual expenditures 
on current enrollees could be less if not all dual enrollment students earn a passing grade or if there are some dual 
enrollment courses that do not qualify for reimbursement under the terms of the bill.  The amounts could also be lower if 
some students reach the annual reimbursement caps under the bill ($300 for freshman and sophomores, $600 for juniors 
and seniors).   
 
The $50 could incentivize the expansion of both existing dual enrollment programs as well as the creation of dual 
enrollment programs in non-participating districts.  To the extent that total usage exceeds $15 million, the bill stipulates 
that ADE shall prioritize distributions to students who are eligible for the federal Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (FRPL) 
program. 
 
Dual Enrollment Incentive Program Fund 
Beginning in FY 2027, the bill would authorize bonuses of $300 per passing grade in a dual enrollment course for students 
enrolled in a high school with less than a 50% FRPL-eligibility rate and $450 per passing grade for students in schools with 
50% or higher FRPL-eligibility rate.  The bonus awards would be pro-rated downward if the actual cost of the awards 
exceeds the appropriation in the bill, which is $5 million. 
 
The 265,830 credits earned by current dual enrollment students would be associated with up to 88,610 courses taken by 
students assuming each course counts for 3 credit hours.  If the distribution of courses passed by students in low-FRPL 
schools versus high-FRPL schools is comparable to the College Credit by Examination Incentive Program (which has the 
same bonus structure), an estimated 88% of the courses would be passed by students in low-FRPL schools  
with the remaining 12% passed by students in high-FRPL schools.  The resulting cost of the full awards would be as 
follows: 
 
• Low-FRPL: 88,610 courses X 88% low-FRPL share X $300 = $23.4 million 
• High-FRPL: 88,610 courses X 12% high-FRPL Share X $450 = $4.8 million 
 
Based on the above data, existing dual enrollment programs would more than exceed the $5.0 million allocation in the 
bill, meaning the awards would need to be pro-rated down by approximately (84)%.   The resulting bonus for low-FRPL 
schools would be $53 per passed exam (instead of $300) and for high-FRPL schools would be $80 per passed exam 
(instead of $450).   
 
The actual reduction in the full award could be lower given that some dual enrollment students would not pass their 
course (and therefore not qualify for a bonus).  For example, in the College Credit by Examination Incentive Program, ADE 
reports the pass rate for exams is only 36.8%.  We expect, however, that the pass-rate in the dual enrollment incentive 
program would be higher given that the bonus would be paid passed on the letter grade issued by the teacher instead of 
performance on a year-end national exam.    
 
Dual Enrollment Development Fund 
The bill authorizes a one-time $1,000 bonus to each teacher that satisfies the requirement for teaching a dual enrollment 
course and provides instruction in at least one dual enrollment course.  Based on the $500,000 appropriation in the bill, 
the full $1,000 incentive could be paid to up to 500 teachers per year.  If the number of teachers applying for the award is 
more than 500, the award would be pro-rated downward.  We lack data on the number of teachers that already are 
eligible to teach a dual enrollment course.   
 
Local Government Impact 
 
To the extent that the bill increases dual enrollment participation, there could be increases in community college formula 
funding.   
 
4/3/23