Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2142

Introduced
1/10/24  
Report Pass
1/17/24  
Introduced
1/10/24  
Report Pass
1/29/24  
Report Pass
1/17/24  
Engrossed
2/6/24  
Report Pass
1/29/24  

Caption

Move over law study committee

Impact

The bill is expected to foster discussions around transportation safety and may lead to legislative proposals aimed at improving the move over law. By highlighting the importance of safety for first responders and citizens alike, the committee's recommendations could influence future policy decisions and resource allocations for promoting road safety. The establishment of the committee suggests a proactive approach to evaluating existing regulations, which might lead to enhanced legal protections for emergency personnel on the road.

Summary

House Bill 2142 aims to establish a study committee focused on assessing the efficacy of Arizona's move over law, specifically codified as section 28-775 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. This law requires drivers to move over or slow down when approaching stationary emergency vehicles with flashing lights. The proposed committee will consist of a bipartisan group of legislators, representatives from the department of transportation and public safety, and a towing industry representative. The committee's primary task is to study the current law and identify any necessary improvements or promotional efforts to enhance compliance and public awareness of the law's requirements.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 2142 appears to be positive, with a clear intent to improve public safety through collaborative legislative efforts. There is recognition among lawmakers of the risks faced by first responders, and the bill positions itself as an important step towards safeguarding both emergency workers and the general public. By appointing a diverse committee, the bill demonstrates an inclusive approach to policymaking, although some may view the resolution as merely a preliminary assessment rather than an immediate solution.

Contention

While the formation of a study committee is generally a consensus-building activity, some legislators may express concerns about the timeline and potential inefficiencies related to the study process. Additionally, there might be differing opinions on the allocation of resources or the need for urgent action regarding the move over law. The bill has a delayed repeal clause, suggesting that it is intended to result in concrete recommendations, but the effectiveness of such a committee depends on the commitment and participation of its members.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ AR96

Changes membership of Budget and Labor Committees; clarifies that bill or resolution may be listed on committee agenda for purposes of amendment.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MN HC6

A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.