Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2274

Introduced
1/16/24  
Report Pass
2/5/24  
Introduced
1/16/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Report Pass
2/5/24  
Engrossed
2/23/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Engrossed
2/23/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Enrolled
6/14/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Enrolled
6/14/24  
Passed
6/21/24  
Passed
6/21/24  
Chaptered
6/21/24  

Caption

Theme park districts; formation

Impact

The implementation of HB 2274 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws regarding local governance and taxation. By allowing cities with populations over 500,000 and counties with populations over 125,000 to establish theme park districts, the bill enables local authorities to attract tourism and economic investment. The exemption from state and local income and property taxes for activities and properties governed by the district is particularly notable, as it positions theme parks as economically beneficial enterprises while potentially reducing tax revenue for local governments.

Summary

House Bill 2274 aims to establish a framework for the creation of theme park districts in Arizona. This legislation outlines the criteria for cities and counties to form districts and grants them significant powers for the construction and management of theme parks. Specifically, it sets population thresholds for cities and counties that may initiate a district, ensures that districts are confined to contiguous properties, and requires that property owners consent to be included in the district. The bill also provides tax exemptions for properties under the district's governance, allowing for financial attractiveness to developers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 2274 appears to be supportive among policymakers who prioritize economic development and tourism. Proponents argue that establishing theme park districts will stimulate local economies and create jobs. However, there are concerns about the potential for overreach in the powers granted to these districts, particularly related to local governance and community impact if districts operate without sufficient public oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 2274 include debates over the extent of local control versus state authority in regulating the formation and management of theme park districts. Critics may voice concerns that the bill could undermine local governments' ability to enforce regulations or address community-specific needs. Furthermore, limitations on retail operations within theme parks could pose challenges for developers looking to maximize profitability through retail sales.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB4306

Relating to authorizing the creation of a residential recreation district in certain counties.

TX HB1391

Relating to the promotion and use of renewable energy systems and energy efficiency improvements; authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds.

TX HB4828

Relating to the creation of Harris County Improvement District No. 21; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds.

TX HB4827

Relating to the creation of Harris County Improvement District No. 20; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds.

AZ SB1145

Special districts; construction; payments

TX HB2770

Relating to the powers and duties of navigation districts, port authorities, and certain municipalities.

TX SB2562

Relating to the creation of the Rowlett Waterfront Entertainment Management District; providing authority to impose a tax, levy an assessment, and issue bonds.

TX SB233

Relating to the creation of the Rowlett Pecan Grove Management District; providing authority to impose a tax, levy an assessment, and issue bonds.