Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1412

Introduced
2/1/24  
Report Pass
2/7/24  
Introduced
2/1/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Report Pass
2/7/24  
Engrossed
2/20/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Engrossed
2/20/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Report Pass
2/28/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  
Report Pass
3/4/24  
Vetoed
4/16/24  
Enrolled
4/10/24  

Caption

Shoplifting; prior offenses

Impact

The enactment of SB1412 is expected to impact both enforcement and prosecution of theft-related crimes in Arizona. By establishing clear monetary thresholds for various offenses, the bill seeks to provide consistency in legal proceedings regarding shoplifting cases. Furthermore, it allows merchants to bring civil action against individuals who shoplift, which can enhance their ability to recover losses. The bill also permits sentencing that may include community service as an alternative to fines, potentially influencing rehabilitation efforts.

Summary

Senate Bill 1412, titled 'Shoplifting; Prior Offenses', amends Arizona Revised Statutes Section 13-1805, which pertains to theft and specifically shoplifting. The bill aims to clarify the definitions and consequences of shoplifting, including detailing the thresholds for classifying offenses as misdemeanors or felonies based on the value of stolen goods. It establishes that shoplifting merchandise valued at $2,000 or more is a class 5 felony, while amounts between $1,000 and $2,000 are classified as a class 6 felony; amounts less than $1,000 are considered a class 1 misdemeanor. Notably, if a firearm is stolen, the offense elevates to a class 6 felony regardless of value.

Sentiment

Overall, sentiment regarding SB1412 varies among stakeholders. Supporters argue that the bill provides necessary tools to combat rising shoplifting cases and aids in clarifying the shoplifting law. They insist that stricter penalties are essential for deterring repeat offenders and protecting merchants from financial losses. Conversely, opponents express concern about the implications of substantially elevating penalties and worry that it may disproportionately affect those in lower socio-economic brackets, who may commit theft due to economic necessity.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB1412 involves the seriousness of escalating penalties associated with repeat offenses. Critics fear that imposing higher charges for individuals with prior theft-related convictions, specifically those who may be struggling with addiction or poverty, does not address the root causes of shoplifting. The bill's supporters, however, maintain that such measures are crucial for holding habitual offenders accountable and enhancing public safety, thus reflecting a broader debate on the balance between punishment and rehabilitation within the criminal justice system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1472

Property crimes; classification; sentencing

MS SB2215

Shoplifting; provide enhancement where merchant is in the business of selling food or drugstore items.

RI S0822

Provides that when 2 or more individuals associate to accomplish the crime of shoplifting, that they would be deemed to be associated for the particular purpose of shoplifting and be guilty of a felony.

NJ A1264

Establishes crime of gang shoplifting.

CA AB1787

Theft: shoplifting.

CA AB335

Retail theft.

RI S0545

Provides for tiered and reduced penalties for offenses of larceny, and shoplifting. Further provides that offenses of shoplifting or larceny would not be misdemeanors, repeals habitual offender provisions and other fraudulent offenses.