Arizona House Bill HB2011

Arizona 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/14/25

Caption

Church of Jesus Christ monument

Impact

The bill's passage would formalize the procedures for erecting the migration monument, which reflects the state's recognition of the historical significance of the Mormon migration. By stipulating that no public monies are to be spent, the bill limits the state's financial involvement and redirects this responsibility to private channels. This measure might enhance community engagement in historical projects, encouraging fundraising efforts and local participation in the monument's realization, while also safeguarding state resources from being allocated to the project.

Summary

House Bill 2011 aims to amend existing legislation regarding the placement of the Church of Jesus Christ migration monument within the governmental mall of Arizona. The bill outlines specific procedures for the installation of the monument, delegating authorization to the Department of Administration. This is framed within the context of Section 41-1363 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, ensuring that the legislative intent and procedural compliance are maintained. The bill emphasizes that public funds will not be utilized for the placement of the monument, placing the onus of funding entirely upon the proponents of the monument, including responsibilities for fundraising and contract negotiations for its design and construction.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB 2011 is the exclusion of public funding for the monument's placement. This stipulation has raised discussions about the potential implications for other similar projects that might wish to seek state resources. Critics may argue that this could set a precedent where state recognition of historical events is limited by funding capabilities, while proponents may see it as a necessary constraint to ensure that taxpayer money is not used for projects with specific cultural ties. The repeal clause, set for September 30, 2025, opens the floor for future legislative discussions about the monument’s ongoing relevance and funding concerns.