Dentists; dental hygienists; compact
The introduction of this compact will notably amend Title 32, Chapter 11 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, adding provisions that facilitate interstate dental practice. Participating states are expected to share licensure and disciplinary information, thereby enhancing the efficiency of regulatory frameworks. This compact aims to protect public health by ensuring that dental professionals operating across state lines continue to meet the safety and competence standards set forth by their home states. Furthermore, it supports military families by exempting them from compact privilege fees, thus alleviating barriers often faced in licensure during relocations.
House Bill 2190 establishes a compact for dentists and dental hygienists that allows practitioners licensed in one participating state to practice in another without having to undergo additional licensing requirements. This legislation aims to enhance workforce mobility and address shortages in dental services across states. By creating a streamlined pathway for licensure, the bill is expected to increase access to dental care for the public while maintaining state regulatory authority over the practice of dentistry and hygiene within their respective borders.
The sentiment surrounding HB 2190 is primarily supportive among dental professionals and advocates for workforce mobility, as it promises to address long-standing issues of access to care in underserved areas. However, there may be concerns among some regulatory bodies regarding the potential for diluted standards if state control is perceived to be lessened. Overall, the compact is viewed favorably as a mechanism to enhance collaboration among states while preserving essential regulatory powers.
While the bill has garnered support, there are notable points of contention regarding the implications of allowing out-of-state practitioners to operate within individual states. Critics argue that this move could undermine local regulatory efforts and lead to inconsistencies in practice standards. Furthermore, questions may arise about the adequacy of state oversight in handling practitioners who may not be familiar with local statutes and regulations, thus raising concerns about patient safety and quality of care.