Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2296

Introduced
1/30/25  
Report Pass
2/12/25  
Report Pass
2/17/25  

Caption

Shared parenting time; presumption; prohibition

Impact

The proposed changes have far-reaching implications for state laws governing custody arrangements. The inclusions dictate that courts must prioritize various factors, such as the child's current environment, parental relationships, and considerations of domestic violence or substance abuse in making decisions. This direct approach may lead to more tailored solutions that reflect the unique situations of families, as opposed to a more generalized divide of custody that may not always serve the child's best interests.

Summary

House Bill 2296, titled 'Shared Parenting Time; Presumption; Prohibition', seeks to amend existing Arizona laws related to parenting time and legal decision-making. The bill aims to provide courts with clearer guidelines when determining parenting arrangements following the dissolution of a marriage or relationship. It specifies that there shall be no presumption in favor of shared parenting time, which signifies that courts will evaluate each case based on a child's best interests rather than relying on an assumption that equal time with both parents is beneficial.

Sentiment

The reaction to HB 2296 has been mixed among stakeholders. Proponents support the bill for emphasizing a child's welfare and adapting judicial discretion to the realities of each case. Critics, however, express concerns about eliminating the presumption of shared parenting, arguing that it might discourage collaborative parenting and undermine the benefits of children maintaining relationships with both parents. The discussion reflects broader societal debates on the dynamics of custody and the roles of parents post-separation.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the parameters set forth regarding domestic violence and substance abuse. Opponents of the bill fear it may create hurdles for non-abusive parents seeking fair access to their children, especially if perceptions of past substance abuse are considered without substantial evidence. Additionally, the elimination of presumptive shared parenting time has stirred fears that it might lead to inequitable outcomes, particularly for parents who could otherwise engage constructively with their children.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3841

Relating to military duty of a conservator of a child in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

NC S394

Prohibit Foreign Ownership of NC Land

AZ HB2574

Small land subdivision; requirements

AZ HB2091

Land division; applicant submissions; review

PA HB414

Enacting the Uniform Deployed Parents Custody and Visitation Act; making repeals; and making editorial changes.

IL HB1162

FOREIGN LAND ACQUIS&CONTRACTS

CA AB1510

State employees: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority: employee relations.

CT HB06735

An Act Prohibiting The Ownership, Possession Or Acquisition Of Interests In Real Property Upon Or Abutting Military Installations Or Agricultural Lands By Certain Foreign Entities.