Ballot measure amendments
If enacted, HB 2470 would provide clarity and structure in the process leading up to ballot measures, which could impact the volume and nature of initiatives and referenda proposed by political committees in Arizona. The requirement for descriptions to be approved by the attorney general may help to mitigate confusion among voters regarding what each measure entails, thereby potentially increasing voter understanding and engagement. However, this may also lead to delays for committees collecting signatures. The mandatory registration of circulators, particularly non-residents and paid circulators, aims to enhance accountability in the signature-gathering process, thereby ensuring that those collecting signatures are complying with state laws.
House Bill 2470, also known as the ballot measure amendments, seeks to amend existing statutes regarding initiatives and referenda in Arizona. The bill aims to repeal specific sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes including 19-102.01 and 19-111.01, modifying how the approval process of ballot measure descriptions is conducted. It introduces a new section that allows political committees to submit descriptions of proposed measures to the attorney general before filing for an initiative or referendum petition, with a ten-day period for approval or rejection of the description. This process is intended to ensure that the language used in ballot measures is clear and lawful, potentially streamlining petition processes.
The measures proposed in HB 2470 are not without controversy. Advocates argue that the bill restores the people's right to legislate through initiatives and referendums, which have faced increasing restrictions. However, critics may view the necessity for attorney general approval and the increased regulation of circulators as potentially burdensome and restrictive. Concerns may also be raised regarding the qualifications and transparency of the circulators, especially paid ones, as improper registrations could lead to significant legal consequences and disqualification of signatures. As such, the bill cultivates discussions on the balance between facilitating the public's legislative power and ensuring the integrity of the electoral processes.