Condominiums; construction defects; actions
Specifically, the legislation impacts the timeline within which claims can be filed related to the development and construction of real property. For actions based on contracts, the timeframe for initiating claims is adjusted from eight years to four years following substantial completion of the property. Moreover, certain claims against municipalities regarding construction defects are similarly restricted, with explicit guidelines on when such actions can be taken, thereby potentially reducing the legal exposure of constructors and municipalities.
House Bill 2599 addresses issues related to construction defects in condominium properties. It amends section 12-552 of the Arizona Revised Statutes and introduces new provisions that dictate how construction defect actions are initiated, particularly emphasizing who can file these actions and under what circumstances. The bill creates a streamlined process requiring the board of directors of a condominium association to obtain approval from a two-thirds majority of unit owners before instituting any legal action concerning alleged construction defects.
The bill’s provisions may ignite contention among property owners and developers, particularly regarding the limitations placed on the time frame for initiating claims. Critics may argue that the relatively short statute of limitations could unfairly protect construction professionals at the expense of condo owners who may not discover defects until later. Furthermore, the requirement that condominium associations must hold meetings and secure a supermajority before proceeding with litigation could delay the redress for homeowners seeking to address legitimate construction issues.
If enacted, HB2599 may also increase the responsibilities of condominium boards, as they must navigate the nuances of organizing votes and meeting legal requirements for construction defect claims. The overall effect of this bill could promote quicker resolutions in construction disputes while potentially limiting the rights of unit owners to claim against developers for long-term latent defects.