| 69 | | - | Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona: Section 1. Subject to the requirements of article IV, part 1, section 1, Constitution of Arizona, section 13-901.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read: START_STATUTE13-901.01. Probation for persons convicted of possession or use of controlled substances or drug paraphernalia; treatment; prevention; education; exceptions; definition A. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, any person who is convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia is eligible for probation. The court shall suspend the imposition or execution of sentence and place the person on probation. B. Any person who has been convicted of or indicted for a violent crime as defined in section 13-901.03 is not eligible for probation as provided for in this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title. C. Personal possession or use of a controlled substance pursuant to this section shall not include possession for sale, production, manufacturing or transportation for sale of any controlled substance. D. If a person is convicted of personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia, as a condition of probation, the court shall require participation in an appropriate drug treatment or education program administered by a qualified agency or organization that provides such programs to persons who abuse controlled substances. Each person who is enrolled in a drug treatment or education program shall be required to pay for participation in the program to the extent of the person's financial ability. E. A person who has been placed on probation pursuant to this section and who is determined by the court to be in violation of probation shall have new conditions of probation established by the court. The court shall select the additional conditions it deems necessary, including intensified drug treatment, community restitution, intensive probation, home arrest or any other sanctions except that the court shall not impose a term of incarceration unless the court determines that the person violated probation by committing an offense listed in chapter 34 or 34.1 of this title or an act in violation of an order of the court relating to drug treatment. F. If a person is convicted a second time of personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia, the court may include additional conditions of probation it deems necessary, including intensified drug treatment, community restitution, intensive probation, home arrest or any other action within the jurisdiction of the court. G. At any time while the defendant is on probation, if after having a reasonable opportunity to do so the defendant fails or refuses to participate in drug treatment, the probation department or the prosecutor may petition the court to revoke the defendant's probation. If the court finds that the defendant refused to participate in drug treatment, the defendant shall no longer be eligible for probation under this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title. H. A person is not eligible for probation under this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title if the court finds the person either: 1. Had been convicted three times of personal possession of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia. 2. Refused drug treatment as a term of probation. 3. Rejected probation. 4. Was convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia and the offense involved methamphetamine. 5. Was convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia and the offense involved fentanyl. This paragraph does not apply if the person had possession of a valid medical prescription for fentanyl. I. Subsections G and H of this section do not prohibit the defendant from being placed on probation pursuant to section 13-901 if the defendant otherwise qualifies for probation under that section. J. For the purposes of this section, "controlled substance" has the same meaning prescribed in section 36-2501. END_STATUTE Sec. 2. Legislative findings A. The legislature finds that: 1. In 1996, the voters of this state passed the drug medicalization, prevention and control act, which generally provided that individuals convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of a controlled substance, including methamphetamine, were eligible for probation and could not be sentenced to a term of incarceration. Only on a third conviction for personal possession or use of a controlled substance could an individual be sentenced to jail or prison, though probation remained a possibility under general sentencing laws. 2. In 2006, the voters approved proposition 301 amending the law to allow sentencing a person convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of methamphetamine to a term of incarceration. This amendment recognized the particularly dangerous and highly addictive nature of methamphetamine and allowed courts to impose jail time as a condition of probation to encourage compliance with drug treatment and rehabilitation programs. 3. Fentanyl has emerged as a leading cause of drug-related deaths in Arizona and across the United States. The department of health services has reported a dramatic increase in opioid-related fatalities, with fentanyl now being the primary driver of overdose deaths. Unlike many other controlled substances, even minute amounts of fentanyl can result in fatal consequences. 4. Arizona's proximity to the southern border has made it a major drug cartel trafficking corridor for illicit fentanyl evidenced by law enforcement agencies reporting an unprecedented rise in fentanyl-related seizures. 5. The extreme potency of fentanyl poses a clear and present danger to Arizona families, first responders and communities. Without stronger legal deterrents, fentanyl will continue to fuel addiction, crime and fatal overdoses at alarming rates. B. The legislature intends to amend existing law to allow courts to impose a term of incarceration on individuals convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of fentanyl. This amendment aligns with the policy established under proposition 301 for methamphetamine and ensures that the judicial system has the necessary authority to enforce treatment compliance and reduce the devastating impact of fentanyl abuse on individuals, families and communities. Sec. 3. Requirements for enactment; three-fourths vote Pursuant to article IV, part 1, section 1, Constitution of Arizona, section 13-901.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, is effective only on the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of the members of each house of the legislature. |
|---|
| 67 | + | Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona: Section 1. Title 9, chapter 2, article 3, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 9-256, to read: START_STATUTE9-256. Common council; increase in taxes or fees; two-thirds vote requirement; state preemption a. Notwithstanding any other law, the common council of a municipality may not levy or impose an increase in any assessment, tax or fee without a two-thirds vote of the common council of the municipality. b. The regulation of increases in municipal assessments, taxes and fees is a matter of statewide concern. A municipality's ability to increase ASSESSMENTS, taxes and fees pursuant to the requirements of subsection a of this section is not subject to further regulation by a municipality. END_STATUTE Sec. 2. Title 11, chapter 2, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 11-225, to read: START_STATUTE11-225. Board of supervisors; increase in taxes or fees; two-thirds vote requirement; state preemption a. Notwithstanding any other law, the board of supervisors of a county may not levy or impose an increase in any assessment, tax or fee without a two-thirds vote of the board of supervisors of the county. b. The regulation of increases in county assessments, taxes and fees is a matter of statewide concern. A county's ability to increase ASSESSMENTS, taxes and fees pursuant to the requirements of subsection a of this section is not subject to further regulation by a county. END_STATUTE |
|---|
| 87 | | - | F. If a person is convicted a second time of personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia, the court may include additional conditions of probation it deems necessary, including intensified drug treatment, community restitution, intensive probation, home arrest or any other action within the jurisdiction of the court. |
|---|
| 88 | | - | |
|---|
| 89 | | - | G. At any time while the defendant is on probation, if after having a reasonable opportunity to do so the defendant fails or refuses to participate in drug treatment, the probation department or the prosecutor may petition the court to revoke the defendant's probation. If the court finds that the defendant refused to participate in drug treatment, the defendant shall no longer be eligible for probation under this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title. |
|---|
| 90 | | - | |
|---|
| 91 | | - | H. A person is not eligible for probation under this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title if the court finds the person either: |
|---|
| 92 | | - | |
|---|
| 93 | | - | 1. Had been convicted three times of personal possession of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia. |
|---|
| 94 | | - | |
|---|
| 95 | | - | 2. Refused drug treatment as a term of probation. |
|---|
| 96 | | - | |
|---|
| 97 | | - | 3. Rejected probation. |
|---|
| 98 | | - | |
|---|
| 99 | | - | 4. Was convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia and the offense involved methamphetamine. |
|---|
| 100 | | - | |
|---|
| 101 | | - | 5. Was convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia and the offense involved fentanyl. This paragraph does not apply if the person had possession of a valid medical prescription for fentanyl. |
|---|
| 102 | | - | |
|---|
| 103 | | - | I. Subsections G and H of this section do not prohibit the defendant from being placed on probation pursuant to section 13-901 if the defendant otherwise qualifies for probation under that section. |
|---|
| 104 | | - | |
|---|
| 105 | | - | J. For the purposes of this section, "controlled substance" has the same meaning prescribed in section 36-2501. END_STATUTE |
|---|
| 106 | | - | |
|---|
| 107 | | - | Sec. 2. Legislative findings |
|---|
| 108 | | - | |
|---|
| 109 | | - | A. The legislature finds that: |
|---|
| 110 | | - | |
|---|
| 111 | | - | 1. In 1996, the voters of this state passed the drug medicalization, prevention and control act, which generally provided that individuals convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of a controlled substance, including methamphetamine, were eligible for probation and could not be sentenced to a term of incarceration. Only on a third conviction for personal possession or use of a controlled substance could an individual be sentenced to jail or prison, though probation remained a possibility under general sentencing laws. |
|---|
| 112 | | - | |
|---|
| 113 | | - | 2. In 2006, the voters approved proposition 301 amending the law to allow sentencing a person convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of methamphetamine to a term of incarceration. This amendment recognized the particularly dangerous and highly addictive nature of methamphetamine and allowed courts to impose jail time as a condition of probation to encourage compliance with drug treatment and rehabilitation programs. |
|---|
| 114 | | - | |
|---|
| 115 | | - | 3. Fentanyl has emerged as a leading cause of drug-related deaths in Arizona and across the United States. The department of health services has reported a dramatic increase in opioid-related fatalities, with fentanyl now being the primary driver of overdose deaths. Unlike many other controlled substances, even minute amounts of fentanyl can result in fatal consequences. |
|---|
| 116 | | - | |
|---|
| 117 | | - | 4. Arizona's proximity to the southern border has made it a major drug cartel trafficking corridor for illicit fentanyl evidenced by law enforcement agencies reporting an unprecedented rise in fentanyl-related seizures. |
|---|
| 118 | | - | |
|---|
| 119 | | - | 5. The extreme potency of fentanyl poses a clear and present danger to Arizona families, first responders and communities. Without stronger legal deterrents, fentanyl will continue to fuel addiction, crime and fatal overdoses at alarming rates. |
|---|
| 120 | | - | |
|---|
| 121 | | - | B. The legislature intends to amend existing law to allow courts to impose a term of incarceration on individuals convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of fentanyl. This amendment aligns with the policy established under proposition 301 for methamphetamine and ensures that the judicial system has the necessary authority to enforce treatment compliance and reduce the devastating impact of fentanyl abuse on individuals, families and communities. |
|---|
| 122 | | - | |
|---|
| 123 | | - | Sec. 3. Requirements for enactment; three-fourths vote |
|---|
| 124 | | - | |
|---|
| 125 | | - | Pursuant to article IV, part 1, section 1, Constitution of Arizona, section 13-901.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, is effective only on the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of the members of each house of the legislature. |
|---|
| 85 | + | b. The regulation of increases in county assessments, taxes and fees is a matter of statewide concern. A county's ability to increase ASSESSMENTS, taxes and fees pursuant to the requirements of subsection a of this section is not subject to further regulation by a county. END_STATUTE |
|---|