Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1022

Introduced
1/14/25  
Report Pass
1/29/25  
Report Pass
2/3/25  
Engrossed
2/12/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Enrolled
4/29/25  
Passed
5/2/25  
Chaptered
5/2/25  

Caption

Small claims court; jurisdictional limit

Impact

The bill is expected to significantly impact the adjudication of civil disputes in Arizona. By raising the jurisdictional cap for small claims courts, the bill intends to reduce the burden on higher courts, while empowering individuals to seek faster resolutions for their claims. This modification aligns with broader efforts to improve the efficiency within the judicial system, making justice more accessible to average citizens who might otherwise be discouraged by the costs and complexities of pursuing claims in more formal judicial settings.

Summary

Senate Bill 1022 amends section 22-503 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, specifically focusing on the jurisdictional limits of small claims courts. The primary change proposed is an increase in the jurisdictional limit for claims processed in small claims court to $5,000, allowing individuals to resolve disputes within this court without necessitating more formal legal proceedings. This adjustment aims to streamline the legal process for minor civil claims, thus facilitating access to justice for those with relatively small claims.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB1022 appears to be positive, especially among legal advocates and citizens who find the previous limits restrictive. The proposal has received support from various stakeholders who believe it expands access to legal remedies for individuals experiencing financial disputes. However, there are concerns from some legal professionals about the potential influx of cases into small claims courts, which might strain existing resources and affect the quality of hearings if not managed properly.

Contention

Notable points of contention primarily revolve around the impact of this change on the judicial system. Critics express apprehension that raising the limit could overwhelm small claims courts with an influx of new cases, potentially leading to longer wait times and backlogged dockets. Furthermore, there are discussions about whether parties may be ill-equipped to represent themselves in higher-value claims now permissible in small claims court, thus complicating the intended ease of access.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB304

Criminal procedure: prosecutorial jurisdiction in multi-jurisdictional elder abuse cases.

CA AB1746

Criminal procedure: jurisdiction of public offenses.

CA AB806

Criminal procedure: crimes in multiple jurisdictions.

CA AB368

Criminal procedure: jurisdiction of public offenses.

CA AB1572

Integrated waste management plans: source reduction and recycling element: review schedule.

CA AB3178

Integrated waste management plans: source reduction and recycling element: diversion requirements.

CA AB815

Integrated waste management plans: source reduction and recycling element and household hazardous waste element: dual stream recycling programs.