Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1182

Introduced
1/27/25  
Report Pass
2/20/25  
Report Pass
2/24/25  
Engrossed
2/28/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Enrolled
5/7/25  
Passed
5/13/25  
Chaptered
5/13/25  

Caption

Municipalities; counties; construction hours

Impact

The immediate impact of SB 1182 is a shift in the regulatory landscape concerning construction noise ordinances. By restricting local governments' ability to impose noise ordinances that would hinder construction during defined periods, the bill centralizes authority over construction hours at the state level. This is expected to mitigate delays in construction projects, especially in areas facing a housing or infrastructure boom, thus facilitating more timely developments. Additionally, the legislation addresses public health, safety, and the economic viability of construction firms in Arizona.

Summary

Senate Bill 1182 emphasizes the allowances for general construction activities during the summer months in Arizona. The bill specifically prohibits municipalities and counties from enacting or enforcing any noise regulations that prevent construction work from occurring between May 1 and October 15 during specified hours. This means contractors can work between 5:00 AM to 7:00 PM on business days and 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM on specific Saturdays if they hold valid building permits. The legislation aims to accommodate the construction industry by providing extended operational hours during the warmer months when construction activity is typically heightened.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 1182 appears largely supportive among construction stakeholders and industry advocates who argue that the alleviation of noise restrictions will enhance business operations and reduce project delays. However, there are concerns among residential advocates about potential disturbances due to construction activities occurring at earlier hours and on weekends. This tension suggests a split in public sentiment, balancing economic interests against quality of life considerations for local residents.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the opposition from community members and certain local officials concerned about noise pollution and the impact of prolonged construction hours on residential areas. Critics argue that the bill disregards the rights of local jurisdictions to self-govern and address noise-related issues pertinent to their communities. This debate highlights a significant challenge for balancing the needs of the construction industry with the well-being of residents living near ongoing construction sites.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

HI HB1223

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Thirty-eighth Representative District.

HI SB1603

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI SB3310

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI SB1575

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI SB1575

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI HB2352

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Forty-first Representative District.

HI SB1408

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Third Senatorial District.

HI HB1369

Relating To Capital Improvement Projects For The Benefit Of The Forty-fifth Representative District.