Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1462

Introduced
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/12/25  
Report Pass
2/17/25  
Engrossed
3/13/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Report Pass
3/31/25  
Enrolled
4/29/25  
Passed
5/2/25  
Chaptered
5/2/25  

Caption

Computer-generated pictorial representations; unlawful disclosure

Impact

The implications of this bill are significant as it introduces stricter penalties for violations. Disclosing these images without consent results in varying classifications of felonies—most notably, a class 5 felony, escalating to a class 4 felony if shared electronically. Moreover, threats of disclosure without actual sharing are classified as a class 1 misdemeanor, indicating a serious legislative approach to protecting personal privacy and reducing instances of harassment stemming from image sharing.

Summary

Senate Bill 1462 amends section 13-1425 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, focusing on the unlawful disclosure of images depicting individuals in states of nudity or engaged in specific sexual activities. The legislation establishes it as unlawful to intentionally disclose an identifiable image of another person in such contexts, provided the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy. This is critical in safeguarding individuals from potential harm that could arise from non-consensual image sharing, particularly in an age where electronic communication is prevalent.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 1462 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocacy groups focused on privacy rights and anti-harassment measures. There’s recognition of the need for stronger laws to protect individuals from potential exploitation and psychological harm. However, some concerns may arise regarding the balance between the enforcement of these laws and the protection of lawful freedoms such as creative expression or journalistic reporting.

Contention

While the bill garners support, there are discussions on its scope and application, particularly in defining what constitutes 'reasonable expectation of privacy'. Critics may argue that the language used in the bill could be potentially ambiguous, leading to possible challenges in enforcement or misinterpretation in various circumstances. This emphasizes the ongoing debate around balancing individual privacy rights with freedom of expression in an increasingly digital world.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OK HB3468

Children; Parent Representation Act; Parent Representation Program; Oklahoma Commission on Children and Youth; funds; duties; exception; Parent Representation Program Revolving Fund; audit; annual report; effective date.

OK HB1017

Children; Family Representation and Advocacy Act; Family Representation and Advocacy Program; purpose; funds; duties; exception; executive director; authority; Family Representation and Advocacy Program Board; appointment; effective date.

OK HB1017

Children; Family Representation and Advocacy Act; Family Representation and Advocacy Program; purpose; funds; duties; exception; executive director; authority; Family Representation and Advocacy Program Board; appointment; effective date.

CA AB616

Agricultural labor relations: labor representative elections: representation ballot card election.

TX HB3003

Relating to the appointment of counsel in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

CA AB535

Olive oil: labeling.

CA AB2074

Agriculture: olive oil: labeling.

DE SB1

An Act To Amend Title 25 Of The Delaware Code Relating To The Residential Landlord-tenant Code.