Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SCR1002

Introduced
1/14/25  
Report Pass
2/12/25  
Report Pass
2/17/25  
Engrossed
3/5/25  

Caption

Photo enforcement systems; prohibition

Impact

If enacted, SCR1002 would significantly reshape traffic enforcement policies in Arizona. By disallowing photo enforcement, it shifts the responsibility of traffic law enforcement back to police officers, aiming to combat concerns over potential abuses associated with profit-driven enforcement systems operated by private entities. This legislation intends to reassure citizens that their safety and law enforcement practices are not being commoditized for government revenues but are focused on community safety.

Summary

SCR1002 is a concurrent resolution aimed at prohibiting the use of photo enforcement systems by local authorities and state agencies in Arizona. The bill seeks to amend existing sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes and introduces a new section that outright bans these systems for detecting violators of traffic regulations such as excessive speeding or disobeying traffic control devices. The resolution highlights the legislature's intent to maintain law enforcement primarily in the hands of trained officers rather than automated systems, emphasizing the human element in law enforcement duties.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SCR1002 appears to be polarized. Supporters argue that the bill protects citizens from unjust practices of photo enforcement and maintains public safety standards. They value the assurance that traffic laws will be enforced by law enforcement officers who receive proper training. In contrast, detractors of the bill may argue that photo enforcement serves to deter traffic violations effectively, and that banning such technology could lead to increases in dangerous driving behavior and traffic accidents.

Contention

Key points of contention around SCR1002 revolve around the effectiveness and fairness of automated enforcement systems versus traditional policing. Proponents suggest that photo enforcement leads to an increase in revenue generation for municipalities at the expense of fair enforcement and community trust. Opponents may argue that eliminating these systems removes an essential tool for reducing traffic violations, overall road safety, and encourages an environment where traffic laws may be more frequently disregarded.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1019

Photo enforcement systems; prohibition

TN HB0810

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 55, relative to utility terrain vehicles.

TN SB0728

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 55, relative to utility terrain vehicles.

NJ A3060

Permits designation of special event zones for traffic regulation purposes during certain large events.

CT SB01377

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Department Of Transportation.

TX HB689

Relating to the use of a photographic traffic enforcement system at a railroad crossing.

TX SB335

Relating to the use of a photographic traffic enforcement system at a railroad crossing.

OH HB54

Make appropriations for transportation for FY 2026-27 biennium