California 2011 2011-2012 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill ACR74 Amended / Bill

Filed 08/16/2011

 BILL NUMBER: ACR 74AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY AUGUST 16, 2011 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Alejo  (   Coauthors:   Assembly Members   Allen,   Campos,  Davis,   Fletcher,   Furutani,   Roger Hernndez,   Hueso,   Huffman,   Lara,   Bonnie Lowenthal,   Mendoza,   Perea,   Portantino,   and Yamada   )  (   Coauthors:   Senators   Corbett   and Kehoe   )  JUNE 30, 2011 Relative to Filipino Americans. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST ACR 74, as amended, Alejo. Filipino Americans. This measure would express the Legislature's apology, on behalf of the people of the state, for violations of the  constitutional and civil rights   civil liberties and constitutional rights  of Filipino Americans  caused by antimiscegenation laws that precluded marriage between Filipinos and Caucasians,  and its regret, on behalf of the people of the state, for the suffering and hardship endured by Filipino Americans as a result of  government actions and programs   governmental actions taken because of various   policies and laws it enacted  . Fiscal committee: no. WHEREAS, Filipino Americans have a long and documented history of suffering discrimination, prejudice, and animosity in the State of California; and WHEREAS, Filipino Americans endured past transgressions and wrongs committed against them through the implementation of state policies and the passage of certain laws, including the segregation of Filipino Americans through the use of separate public facilities and targeted  immigration  policies; and WHEREAS, In the 1920s, sentiment against Filipino Americans was fueled by the Department of Industrial Relations publishing "Facts about Filipino Immigration into California" that contained an introduction describing a "third wave of Filipino immigration," the pace of which was characterized as being too great, and that implied the wrong kind of Filipinos were immigrating to the state; and WHEREAS, In 1921, the California Legislature passed an amendment to the Political Code that allowed the legal establishment of separate schools for children of Chinese, Japanese, Indian, or Mongolian heritage; and WHEREAS, Once those schools were built, districts in Sacramento County maintained separate education facilities in the communities of Florin, Walnut Grove, Isleton, and Courtland, and Chinese, Japanese, and Filipino children in these school districts attended segregated schools until World War II; and  WHEREAS, In 1929, the California Attorney General wrote an opinion that was contrary to one written in 1921 by the Los Angeles County Counsel regarding the question of whether county clerks in Los Angeles County could issue marriage licenses to Filipinos without violating the antimiscegenation law, which classified Filipinos as being Mongolian; and   WHEREAS, Many counties in the state sought outside counsel on the question of whether a county could issue a marriage license to a Filipino and Caucasian couple, and in 1926, the Attorney General issued an opinion stating that Filipinos were part of the Mongolian race, and that marriage between Filipinos and Caucasians was prohibited under antimiscegenation laws prohibiting marriage between Mongolians and Caucasians; and  WHEREAS, In 1929, the California Legislature passed a resolution requesting an enactment by the United States Congress to restrict Filipino immigration; and WHEREAS, The Northern Monterey Chamber of Commerce adopted anti-Filipino resolutions proclaiming that Filipinos were undesirable, depressed the wage scale of other nationalities, possessed unhealthy habits, and brought in disease; and WHEREAS, In 1930, the most explosive anti-Filipino riot occurred in Watsonville where Filipinos were relentlessly harassed, and the riot culminated in the killing of Fermin Tobera; and WHEREAS, Anti-Filipino riots quickly spread throughout California to cities such as Stockton, San Francisco, Salinas, and San Jose; and WHEREAS, Anti-Filipino vigilante groups committed acts of violence due to the beliefs that Filipino field laborers were  intermingling and having intimate relations with Caucasian women, in violation of the California antimiscegenation laws enacted during that time, and were depressing wages in the harvest fields and   intermingling with Caucasian women, depressing wages in the harvest fields, and  taking jobs belonging to Americans; and WHEREAS, In 1933, the California Legislature amended its antimiscegenation law to cause any marriage of Caucasians with "negroes, Mongolians, members of the Malay race, or mulattoes to be illegal and void"; and WHEREAS, In 1934, the federal government passed the Tydings-McDuffie Act, also known as the Philippine Independence Act, which limited Filipino immigration to the United States to 50 persons per year; and WHEREAS, Section 8 of the Tydings-McDuffie Act recognized the Philippine Islands as a separate country and restricted immigration by considering citizens of the Philippine Islands who were not citizens of the United States to be aliens; and WHEREAS, the Tydings-McDuffie Act paved the way for the Filipino Repatriation Act of 1935; and WHEREAS, In 1935, the United States Congress passed the  Filipino Repatriation Act, which called for the federal government to pressure Filipinos to return to the Philippines by offering them free passage there; and   WHEREAS, In 1946, California voters defeated Proposition 11, which would have outlawed discrimination based on race, religion, color, national origin, or ancestry in the area of employment practices and would have established a Fair Employment Practices Commission to promote equal opportunity in employment; now, therefore, be it   Filipino Repatriation   Act, which encouraged Filipinos to return to the Philippines voluntarily; however, those that chose to leave the United States and wanted to return were subject to the 50-person quota established in the Tydings-McDuffie Act; now, therefore, be it  Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature, on behalf of the people of the state, apologizes to Filipino Americans in California for fundamental violations of basic constitutional and civil rights through de jure and de facto discrimination committed during the 1920s through the 1940s; and be it further Resolved, That the Legislature, on behalf of the people of the  state, apologizes to Filipino Americans for the violations of civil liberties and constitutional rights committed during the period of illegal deportation and coerced emigration; and be it further  Resolved,  That the Legislature, on behalf of the people of the state, expresses regret for the suffering and hardship those individuals and their families endured as a direct result of the government-sponsored Repatriation Program of the 1930s; and be it further   state, expresses regret for amending the Political Code to allow separate schools for children of Chinese, Japanese, Indian, or Mongolian heritage; and be it further   Resolved, That the Legislature, on behalf of the people of the state, expresses regret for the passage of a resolution requesting that the United States Congress restrict Filipino immigration; and be it further   Resolved, That the Legislature, on behalf of the people of the state, apologizes to Filipino Americans for violations of civil liberties and constitutional rights caused by antimiscegenation laws that prohibited marriage between Filipinos and Caucasians; and be it further  Resolved, That the Legislature, on behalf of the people of the state, expresses its regret for the suffering and hardship those individuals and their families endured as a direct result of governmental actions taken because of the state's various policies and laws that it had enacted; and be it further Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the Members of the Legislature and to the author for appropriate distribution.