California Senate Bill SB453 Latest Draft

 BILL NUMBER: SB 453AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 17, 2013 INTRODUCED BY Senator Huff  (   Coauthors:   Senators   Anderson,   Berryhill,   Emmerson,  Fuller,   Gaines,   Knight,   Nielsen,   Walters,   and Wyland   )  FEBRUARY 21, 2013 An act to amend Sections 14501, 44662, 44955, and 44956 of, to amend and repeal Section 44660 of, and to add Sections 44660.5, 44955.1, and 44955.2 to, the Education Code, relating to school employees. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 453, as amended, Huff. School employees: teachers: evaluation: termination. (1) Existing law expresses the intent of the Legislature that governing boards of school districts establish a uniform system of evaluation and assessment of the performance of all certificated personnel of a school district, including schools conducted or maintained by county superintendents of education.  Existing law prohibits the evaluation and assessment of certificated employee performance from including the use of publishers' norms established by standardized tests.  This bill would instead require the governing board of a school district to establish an evaluation and assessment system for certificated employees that uses a multiple-measures evaluation system with multiple research-validated approaches to measuring effectiveness, as specified. The governing board would be required to establish the system by the 2015-16 school year  ,  and to fully implement the system by the 2016-17 school year  , and would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to institute fiscal penalties for noncompliance  .  The bill would delete the provisions prohibiting the use of publishers' norms established by standardized tests in evaluating and assessing certificated employees.  The bill would require a compliance audit to include the verification of the development and implementation of the evaluation system. Because the bill would increase the duties of school districts, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law provides that, when employees are terminated pursuant to a reduction in workforce, a school district is required to terminate the employees in order of seniority. Existing law further provides those employees with preferred right to reappointment and opportunity for substitute service in order of seniority. Existing law authorizes a school district to deviate from the order of seniority for those purposes for specified reasons, including compliance with constitutional requirements related to equal protection of the laws. This bill would provide additional reasons for which a school district may deviate from terminating employees in order of seniority, including authorizing school districts to terminate employees on the basis of performance evaluations and on the basis that the employee is assigned to a schoolsite that has been selected by the governing board for exemption from certificated reductions in force, based upon the needs of the educational program. The bill would provide an exception to this authorization for an employee who has 18 months or less from his or her date of retirement, or is on medical leave. The bill would specify that the equal protection exception to the general requirement that terminations and reappointments occur in order of seniority applies to equal protection as it relates to pupils. (3) Existing law generally requires school districts to adhere to certain requirements with respect to teacher and administrator employment, and requires charter school petitions to contain certain information relating to employment. This bill would authorize school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools to assign, reassign, and transfer teachers and administrators based on effectiveness and subject matter needs, without regard to years of service. (4) This bill would make various nonsubstantive and clarifying changes. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 14501 of the Education Code is amended to read: 14501. (a) As used in this chapter, "financial and compliance audit" shall be consistent with the definition provided in the "Standards for Audits of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions" promulgated by the Comptroller General of the United States. Financial and compliance audits conducted under this chapter shall fulfill federal single audit requirements. (b) As used in this chapter, "compliance audit" means an audit that ascertains and verifies whether or not funds provided through apportionment, contract, or grant, either federal or state, have been properly disbursed and expended as required by law or regulation or both and includes the verification of each of the following: (1) The reporting requirements for the sufficiency of textbooks or instructional materials, or both, as defined in Section 60119. (2) Teacher misassignments pursuant to Section 44258.9. (3) The accuracy of information reported on the School Accountability Report Card required by Section 33126. The requirements set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) and this paragraph shall be added to the audit guide requirements pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 14502.1. (4) The development and implementation of the teacher  and principal  evaluation system required pursuant to Section 44660.5. SEC. 2. Section 44660 of the Education Code is amended to read: 44660. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature that governing boards establish a uniform system of evaluation and assessment of the performance of all certificated personnel within each school district of the state, including schools conducted or maintained by county superintendents of education. The system shall involve the development and adoption by each school district of objective evaluation and assessment guidelines which may, at the discretion of the governing board, be uniform throughout the district or, for compelling reasons, be individually developed for territories or schools within the district, provided that all certificated personnel of the district shall be subject to a system of evaluation and assessment adopted pursuant to this article. (b) This article does not apply to certificated personnel who are employed on an hourly basis in adult education classes. (c) This section shall become inoperative on July 1, 2015, and, as of January 1, 2016, is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that becomes operative on or before January 1, 2016, deletes or extends the dates on which it becomes inoperative and is repealed. SEC. 3. Section 44660.5 is added to the Education Code, to read: 44660.5. (a) (1) By the 2015-16 school year, the governing board of a school district shall establish a uniform system of evaluation and assessment of the performance of all certificated employees within the school district, and shall fully implement the system by the 2016-17 school year. The system shall clearly define a rigorous, transparent, and fair multiple-measures evaluation system for  both  teachers  and principals   ,  and shall involve the development and adoption by the governing board of objective evaluation and assessment guidelines. All certificated employees of the school district shall be subject to a system of evaluation and assessment adopted pursuant to this article, except that this article does not apply to certificated employees who are employed on an hourly basis in adult education classes. (2) This article applies to the county superintendent of schools and the employees of schools conducted or maintained by the county superintendent of schools. (b) For purposes of this section, a "multiple-measures evaluation system" is a teacher  and principal  evaluation system that uses multiple research-validated approaches to measuring effectiveness, including the measures specified in Section 44662. A school district evaluation system also shall include a quantitative pupil academic achievement growth component that shall constitute at least 30 percent of the overall teacher  and principal  effectiveness measure.  A school district may use other measures of student performance in subjects for which quantitative measures of student growth are not available.  (c)  (1)    The requirement to develop and implement the evaluation system shall be subject to the annual audits, conducted pursuant to Section 14501, commencing with the 2015-16 fiscal year.  (2) The Superintendent shall institute fiscal penalties for noncompliance with this section. Fiscal penalties shall include, but not be limited to, withholding 10 percent of the school district or county office of education apportionments. This withholding shall be returned to the school district or county office of education once the evaluation system required by this section is implemented.  SEC. 4. Section 44662 of the Education Code is amended to read: 44662. (a) The governing board of each school district shall establish standards of expected pupil achievement at each grade level in each area of study. (b) The governing board of each school district shall evaluate and assess certificated employee performance as it reasonably relates to: (1) The progress of pupils toward the standards established pursuant to subdivision (a) and, if applicable, the state adopted academic content standards as measured by state adopted criterion referenced assessments. (2) The instructional techniques and strategies used by the employee. (3) The employee's adherence to curricular objectives. (4) The establishment and maintenance of a suitable learning environment, within the scope of the employee's responsibilities. (c) The governing board of each school district shall establish and define job responsibilities for certificated noninstructional personnel, including, but not limited to, supervisory and administrative personnel, whose responsibilities cannot be evaluated appropriately under the provisions of subdivision (b) and shall evaluate and assess the performance of those noninstructional certificated employees as it reasonably relates to the fulfillment of those responsibilities. (d) Results of an employee's participation in the Peer Assistance and Review Program for Teachers established by Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 44500) shall be made available as part of the evaluation conducted pursuant to this section.  (e) The evaluation and assessment of certificated employee performance pursuant to this section shall not include the use of publishers' norms established by standardized tests.   (e)   (f)  This section does not limit the authority of the governing board of a school district to develop and adopt additional evaluation and assessment guidelines or criteria. SEC. 5. Section 44955 of the Education Code is amended to read: 44955. (a) A permanent employee shall not be deprived of his or her position for causes other than those specified in Sections 44907 and 44923, and Sections 44932 to 44947, inclusive, and a probationary employee shall not be deprived of his or her position for cause other than as specified in Sections 44948 to 44949, inclusive. (b) (1) Whenever in any school year the average daily attendance in all of the schools of a district for the first six months in which school is in session has declined below the corresponding period of either of the previous two school years, whenever the governing board determines that attendance in a district will decline in the following year as a result of the termination of an interdistrict tuition agreement as described in Section 46304, whenever a particular kind of service is to be reduced or discontinued not later than the beginning of the following school year, or whenever the amendment of state law requires the modification of curriculum, and when in the opinion of the governing board of the district it has become necessary by reason of any of these conditions to decrease the number of permanent employees in the district, the governing board may terminate the services of not more than a corresponding percentage of the certificated employees of the district, permanent as well as probationary, at the close of the school year. Except as otherwise provided by statute, the services of a permanent employee shall not be terminated under the provisions of this section while any probationary employee, or any other employee with less seniority, is retained to render a service that the permanent employee is certificated and competent to render. (2) In computing a decline in average daily attendance for purposes of this section for a newly formed or reorganized school district, each school of the district shall be deemed to have been a school of the newly formed or reorganized district for both of the two previous school years. (3) As between employees who first rendered paid service to the district on the same date, the governing board shall determine the order of termination solely on the basis of needs of the district and the pupils, including distinctions based upon performance evaluations. Upon the request of any employee whose order of termination is so determined, the governing board shall furnish in writing no later than five days prior to the commencement of the hearing held in accordance with Section 44949, a statement of the specific criteria used in determining the order of termination and the application of the criteria in ranking each employee relative to the other employees in the group. This requirement that the governing board provide, on request, a written statement of reasons for determining the order of termination shall not be interpreted to give affected employees any legal right or interest that would not exist without such a requirement. (c) Notice of termination of services shall be given before the May 15 in the manner prescribed in Section 44949, and services of employees shall be terminated in the inverse of the order in which they were employed, as determined by the board in accordance with Sections 44844 and 44845. In the event that a permanent or probationary employee is not given the notices and a right to a hearing as provided for in Section 44949, he or she shall be deemed reemployed for the ensuing school year. (d) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), and except as specified in subdivision (e), a school district may deviate from terminating a certificated employee in order of seniority for any of the following reasons: (1) The district demonstrates a specific need for personnel to teach a specific course or course of study, or to provide services authorized by a services credential with a specialization in either pupil personnel services or health for a school nurse, and that the certificated employee has special training and experience necessary to teach that course or course of study or to provide those services, which others with more seniority do not possess. (2) For purposes of maintaining or achieving compliance with constitutional requirements related to equal protection of the laws as it applies to pupils. (3) On the basis of performance evaluations, if pursuant to a process whereby employees with superior evaluations are retained over those with inferior evaluations. The governing board may exercise its discretion in developing the process, which shall be applied uniformly to the entire class that is subject to the reduction in force. (4) On the basis that the employee is assigned to a schoolsite that has been selected by the governing board for exemption from certificated reductions in force, based upon the needs of the educational program. (e) A school district shall not deviate from terminating a certificated employee in order of seniority if the employee has 18 months or less from his or her date of retirement, or is on medical leave. SEC. 6. Section 44955.1 is added to the Education Code, to read: 44955.1. Notwithstanding any other law, a school district, county office of education, or charter school may assign, reassign, and transfer teachers and administrators based on effectiveness and subject matter needs without regard to years of service. SEC. 7. Section 44955.2 is added to the Education Code, to read: 44955.2. A school district that deviates from the order of seniority for purposes of terminating a certificated employee under any provision of this chapter shall do so on the basis of one or more of the items specified in subdivision (d) of Section 44955  ,  and shall not take into consideration whether an employee has exercised any of the rights guaranteed under Chapter 10.7 (commencing with Section 3540) of Division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code. SEC. 8. Section 44956 of the Education Code is amended to read: 44956. A permanent employee whose services have been terminated as provided in Section 44955 shall have the following rights: (a) For the period of 39 months from the date of the termination, any employee who in the meantime has not attained the age of 65 years shall have the preferred right to reappointment, in the order of original employment as determined by the board in accordance with Sections 44831 to 44855, inclusive, if the number of employees is increased or the discontinued service is reestablished, with no requirements that were not imposed upon other employees who continued in service; provided, that no probationary or other employee with less seniority shall be employed to render a service that the employee is certificated and competent to render. However, prior to reappointing any employee to teach a subject which he or she has not previously taught, and for which he or she does not have a teaching credential or which is not within the employee's major area of postsecondary study or the equivalent thereof, the governing board shall require the employee to pass a subject matter competency test in the appropriate subject. (b) The aforesaid right to reappointment may be waived by the employee, without prejudice, for not more than one school year, unless the board extends this right, but the waiver shall not deprive the employee of his or her right to subsequent offers of reappointment. (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a school district may deviate from reappointing a certificated employee in order of seniority for either of the following reasons: (1) The district demonstrates a specific need for personnel to teach a specific course or course of study, or to provide services authorized by a services credential with a specialization in either pupil personnel services or health for a school nurse, and that the employee has special training and experience necessary to teach that course or course of study, or to provide those services, which others with more seniority do not possess. (2) For purposes of maintaining or achieving compliance with constitutional requirements related to equal protection of the laws as it applies to pupils. (d) For an employee who is reappointed, the period of his or her absence shall be treated as a leave of absence and shall not be considered as a break in the continuity of his or her service, he or she shall retain the classification and order of employment he or she had when his or her services were terminated, and credit for prior service under any state or district retirement system shall not be affected by the termination, but the period of his or her absence shall not count as a part of the service required for retirement. (e) During the period of an employee's preferred right to reappointment, the employee, in the order of original employment, shall be offered prior opportunity for substitute service during the absence of any other employee who has been granted a leave of absence or who is temporarily absent from duty; provided, that his or her services may be terminated upon the return to duty of the other employee and that the substitute service shall not affect the retention of his or her previous classification and rights. If, in any school year the employee serves as a substitute in any position requiring certification for 21 days or more within a period of 60 schooldays, the compensation the employee receives for substitute service in that 60-day period, including his or her first 20 days of substitute service, shall not be less than the amount the employee would receive if he or she were being reappointed. (f) Notwithstanding subdivision (e), a school district may deviate from the order of seniority in offering the opportunity for substitute service for either of the following reasons: (1) The district demonstrates a specific need for personnel to teach a specific course or course of study, or to provide services authorized by a services credential with a specialization in either pupil personnel services or health for a school nurse, and the employee has special training and experience, and has demonstrated the competency necessary to teach in a specified grade level or course of study, or to provide those services, that others with more seniority do not possess or are not able to provide. (2) For purposes of maintaining or achieving compliance with constitutional requirements related to equal protection of the laws as it applies to pupils. (g) (1) During the period of the employee's preferred right to reappointment, the governing board of the district, if it is also the governing board of one or more other districts, may assign the employee to service that he or she is certificated and competent to render, in one of the other districts. The compensation the employee receives, in the discretion of the governing board, may be the same as the employee would have received had he or she been serving in the district from which the employee's services were terminated. The employee's service in the other district or districts shall be counted toward the period required for both state and local retirement as though rendered in the district from which the employee' s services were terminated. The employee shall not displace any other permanent employee in the other district or districts. (2) It is the intent of this subdivision that the employees of a school district, the governing board of which is also the governing board of one or more other school districts, shall not be at a disadvantage as compared with employees of a unified school district. (h) At any time prior to the completion of one year after the employee's return to service, the employee may continue or make up, with interest, his or her own contributions to any state or district retirement system for the period of his or her absence, but it shall not be obligatory on the state or district to match the contributions. (i) If the employee becomes disabled or reaches retirement age at any time before his or her return to service, the employee shall receive, in any state or district retirement system of which the employee was a member, all benefits to which he or she would have been entitled if the disability or retirement occurred at the time of his or her termination of service, plus any benefits the employee may have qualified for thereafter, as though still employed. SEC. 9. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.