California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1066

Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/6/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
6/1/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/29/17  
Refer
6/29/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  
Enrolled
9/15/17  
Chaptered
10/9/17  

Caption

Public works: definition.

Impact

The amendment is expected to lead to an increase in the awareness and enforcement of prevailing wage laws related to public works that involve tree removal. By classifying tree removal as a public works project, workers in this sector will now receive protections under the law that were previously not applicable. This could have financial implications for local agencies and school districts which may have to adjust their budgeting and contracting processes to accommodate this change.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1066, introduced by Assemblymember Aguiar-Curry, aims to amend Section 1720 of the California Labor Code by expanding the definition of 'public works.' Specifically, it includes certain tree removal work under this definition, thereby subjecting this type of work to the same prevailing wage requirements that apply to other public works projects. This change is significant as it impacts how such work is regulated and compensated, ensuring that wage standards are upheld even in this newly included area.

Sentiment

Overall, there appears to be a mixed sentiment surrounding AB 1066. Supporters argue that the expansion of the definition to include tree removal is a necessary step to safeguard workers' rights and uphold fair wage practices. However, some opposition exists regarding the potential increased costs associated with compliance, which may create financial strains on local agencies responsible for managing these projects. This has sparked discussions about the balance between worker protections and budgetary constraints.

Contention

A notable point of contention lies in the potential financial impact on local entities. Critics of the bill express concern that introducing new prevailing wage requirements could deter investments in public works projects due to increased costs. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that no reimbursement will be required by local agencies for the costs incurred due to this act, raising concerns about unfunded mandates and the financial burden placed on these agencies as they adjust to the new provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1768

Prevailing wage: public works.

CA AB199

Public works: private residential projects.

CA AB520

Public works: public subsidy.

CA AB3190

Public works.

CA AB3155

Public works: definition.

CA AB2231

Public works.

CA AB1886

Public works: definition.

CA SB618

Child support: enforcement.