California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1113

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
5/31/17  
Report Pass
5/31/17  
Refer
5/31/17  
Refer
5/31/17  
Report Pass
6/6/17  
Report Pass
6/6/17  
Refer
6/6/17  
Refer
6/6/17  
Report Pass
6/20/17  
Refer
6/20/17  
Refer
6/20/17  
Enrolled
7/6/17  
Enrolled
7/6/17  
Chaptered
7/21/17  
Chaptered
7/21/17  
Passed
7/21/17  

Caption

State Transit Assistance Program.

Impact

One of the key impacts of AB 1113 is the restructuring of the State Transit Assistance (STA) funding model, where financial support will now be directly tied to the operational efficiency and revenue-generating capacity of transit operators. This shift means that local transportation agencies will need to adapt to new reporting requirements and potentially alter their funding applications to align with the bill's provisions. Moreover, the revisions aim to streamline administrative tasks related to fund allocation, thus potentially resulting in faster disbursement timelines for necessary operational investments.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1113, also known as the State Transit Assistance Program, is a legislative measure designed to refine the funding mechanisms for public transportation in California by amending several sections of the Public Utilities Code. The bill mandates that funds allocated to public transportation operators will now exclusively go to those deemed 'STA-eligible,' ensuring that funding is disbursed more transparently and in alignment with operators' financial performance. By emphasizing eligibility criteria based on operator revenues and compliance requirements, the bill aims to strengthen accountability within the allocation process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1113 appears to be largely positive among supporters who see it as a necessary reform for ensuring effective use of taxpayer funds in public transit. Those in favor argue that the bill's emphasis on accountability and performance metrics will lead to improved public transportation services. However, some dissenters express concerns about the potential for reduced funding for smaller transit operators who may struggle to meet the new financial thresholds set forth by the bill, highlighting a divide in sentiment based on geographic and operational contexts.

Contention

Notable points of contention included the impact of stringent eligibility requirements, particularly how they might affect smaller or less financially robust transit operators. Critics argue that the shift could inadvertently disenfranchise these members of the public transportation ecosystem, while supporters counter that the restructuring is necessary for achieving systematic efficiency and equity in fund distribution. The urgency clause attached to the bill’s enactment points to a recognized need for immediate reform, reflecting broader challenges in California's transportation funding landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB122

Transportation.

CA AB90

Transportation.

CA SB125

Transportation budget trailer bill.

CA AB125

Transportation budget trailer bill.

CA SB595

Metropolitan Transportation Commission: toll bridge revenues: BART Inspector General: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority: high-occupancy toll lanes.

CA AB149

Transportation.

CA SB548

Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority: transit connectivity.

CA SB149

Budget Act of 2022.