California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1163

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
4/3/17  
Report Pass
4/4/17  
Report Pass
4/4/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Report Pass
4/27/17  
Report Pass
4/27/17  
Refer
5/2/17  
Refer
5/2/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/22/17  
Report Pass
6/22/17  
Refer
6/22/17  
Refer
6/22/17  
Refer
6/26/17  
Refer
6/26/17  
Report Pass
9/7/17  
Refer
9/7/17  
Refer
9/7/17  
Refer
2/14/18  
Refer
2/14/18  
Report Pass
6/4/18  
Report Pass
6/4/18  
Refer
6/4/18  

Caption

Minors: power of attorney to care for a minor child.

Impact

The passage of AB1163 would revise several existing statutes related to environmental regulations, potentially affecting how local governments enforce compliance standards. By centralizing some regulatory oversight at the state level, the bill is expected to limit the ability of local jurisdictions to impose stricter environmental regulations than those mandated by state law. This change could streamline processes for businesses operating in multiple areas, as they would have a uniform set of guidelines to follow.

Summary

AB1163 is a proposed legislation aimed at revising the current regulations overseeing environmental compliance for businesses in the state. The bill focuses on simplifying the compliance process for businesses while ensuring that environmental standards are maintained. Proponents argue that this change will alleviate administrative burdens for companies, fostering a more business-friendly environment without compromising on the essential protections for the environment. Overall, the bill seeks to strike a balance between economic development and environmental stewardship.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB1163 reflects a divide between business interests and environmental advocates. Supporters of the bill, largely from the business sector, hail the potential for reduced regulatory burdens and enhanced economic growth. Conversely, environmental groups and some lawmakers express concerns that the bill might weaken local efforts to protect their unique environments, fearing that a one-size-fits-all approach could lead to less responsive governance when addressing local ecological needs.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the bill's potential to limit local government's power in enforcing environmental regulations. Critics argue that while the intent is to create uniformity, the execution could undermine localities' ability to address specific environmental challenges, thus risking ecological integrity in favor of broader economic incentives. The ongoing debate encapsulates broader themes of state versus local authority, emphasizing the tug-of-war between facilitating business operations and safeguarding environmental health.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB495

Family Preparedness Plan Act of 2025.

CA SB40

State Bar of California.

CA AB2964

Domestic violence: victim’s rights.

CA AB1194

Conservatorship.

CA AB1601

Jury duty: eligibility.

CT HB06774

An Act Concerning Adoption Of The Connecticut Uniform Power Of Attorney Act.

CT SB01005

An Act Protecting Elderly Consumers From Exploitation.

MN SF2567

Default surrogate for health decisions creation and process to appoint default surrogate for health decisions provision