California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1225

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Engrossed
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Report Pass
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/7/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/18/18  
Report Pass
6/18/18  
Refer
6/18/18  
Refer
6/18/18  
Report Pass
6/28/18  
Report Pass
6/28/18  
Refer
6/28/18  

Caption

State Department of Public Health: regulations and program flexibility.

Impact

The implications of AB 1225 could be significant for health facilities operating in California, as it revises reporting requirements and enforces prioritization in the regulatory amendments concerning cardiovascular services. This change aims to ensure that regulations reflect modern practices and improve health service delivery, potentially enhancing patient care in the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1225 focuses on enhancing the operations of the State Department of Public Health by requiring it to modernize its regulations related to public health, particularly concerning cardiovascular surgery and cardiac catheterization laboratory services. The bill mandates the department to report by January 1, 2020, detailing its attempts to update these regulations and review the usage of program flexibility waivers, which allow health facilities alterations from standard regulations under certain circumstances.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1225 seems favorable among healthcare providers and operational agencies that support modern regulations and operational flexibility for health services. However, there may be concerns from advocacy groups emphasizing the need for stringent regulations to ensure patient safety and high-quality health standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise around how program flexibility waivers are implemented and monitored, as well as the effectiveness of declarations made by facilities regarding their regulatory statuses. Critics may argue that without stringent oversight, the intended benefits of modernization could dilute regulatory adherence, thus affecting public confidence in health service quality.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB370

Ambulatory surgical centers.

CA AB3083

Ambulatory surgical centers.

CA SB1464

Health facilities: cardiac catheterization laboratory services.

CA AB2204

Clinics: licensure and regulation: exemption.

CA AB1037

Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Hospital: clinics: licensure and regulation: exemption.

ME LD844

An Act to Protect the Practice of Certain Cardiovascular Professionals

MD HB757

State Board of Physicians - Supervised Medical Graduates and Cardiovascular Invasive Specialists (Bridge to Medical Residency Act)

FL H1259

Providers of Cardiovascular Services