California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1281

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Refer
4/3/17  
Refer
4/3/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Refer
5/3/17  

Caption

State parks: climate change: study.

Impact

By requiring a systematic evaluation of state parks and suggesting necessary adaptations, AB 1281 intends to strengthen the state's response to climate change threats. This could potentially alter existing policies regarding park management and planning, ensuring they align with newly established findings about climate resilience. Moreover, the amendments to the Public Resources Code relate directly to development regulations in coastal areas, indicating a broader legislative intent to harmonize environmental protection with infrastructure development.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1281 seeks to address the impacts of climate change on California's state park system by mandating the Department of Parks and Recreation conduct a comprehensive study. This study aims to evaluate existing infrastructural integrity amidst changing climate conditions and to identify potential measures to safeguard these parks. The study is expected to include recommendations for future actions that can be undertaken by the department and other related agencies to mitigate climate change effects on park facilities and access.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1281 is largely supportive among environmental advocates who see it as a proactive approach towards addressing the imminent threats posed by climate change. However, there exists a cautious perspective from some lawmakers concerned about the implications of regulatory changes for local development. The bill's progress indicates a recognition of climate change as a critical issue, though discussions on specific methods of implementation and regulation remain contentious among different stakeholders.

Contention

Significant points of contention include concerns about how the bill may affect existing development regulations, particularly in coastal areas. Critics argue that while the intent is noble, there could be challenges in balancing developmental needs with conservation efforts. Additionally, the bureaucratic requirements set forth in the bill may raise apprehension regarding compliance among local governments and state agencies tasked with executing its recommendations. The upcoming assessments and recommendations from this study will likely fuel ongoing debates about the role of state parks in climate adaptation strategies and infrastructure planning.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB934

Zero-emission freight infrastructure: interagency coordination: report.

CA SB1075

Hydrogen: green hydrogen: emissions of greenhouse gases.

CA SB265

Cybersecurity preparedness: critical infrastructure sectors.

CA SB18

Hydrogen: green hydrogen: emissions of greenhouse gases.

CA AB3015

Marine terminal operations.

CA SB892

Cybersecurity preparedness: food and agriculture sector and water and wastewater systems sector.

CA SB671

Transportation: Clean Freight Corridor Efficiency Assessment.

CA AB1159

Employment Development Department: reports.