The legislation highlights the state's intent to develop a robust network of logistic hubs connected through rail, roads, and air. This development is framed as a matter of statewide concern for economic competitiveness and growth. The benefits cited in support of the bill include job creation, significant economic gains, increased state and local tax revenue, and environmental enhancements due to better goods movement practices. The bill also explicitly includes inland ports in its definitions, recognizing their growing importance in freight systems.
Summary
Assembly Bill 1561, introduced by Quirk-Silva, amends sections of the Government Code relating to economic development, particularly focusing on the establishment and enhancement of logistic hubs in California. The bill extends the deadline for the Director of the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development to submit a strategy for international trade and investment, which must include evaluations of logistic hubs, from February 1, 2019, to July 1, 2019. This strategy is crucial for addressing both current and future workforce and infrastructure needs associated with trade.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding AB 1561 appears to be positive, particularly among supporters arguing that it will strengthen California's position in both domestic and international markets. The push for infrastructural improvements is considered essential for supporting economic development and adapting to changing economic demands. Some potential concerns may arise from stakeholders focused on environmental impacts and local community needs, but these do not seem to have generated widespread opposition during discussions.
Contention
Notably, the bill addresses logistical and infrastructural challenges by proposing a clearer framework for evaluating and developing the necessary ports and transportation networks. This move is aimed at reducing congestion and improving efficiency in goods movement. However, the integration of inland ports could spark discussions on appropriating resources and addressing the balance between state and local governance in economic development initiatives.
Local government: infrastructure financing districts: Reinvestment in Infrastructure for a Sustainable and Equitable California (RISE) districts: housing development: restrictive covenants.
State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program: assessments and forecasts: integrated energy policy report.