California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1564

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/6/17  
Report Pass
4/6/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Report Pass
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/10/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  

Caption

Agricultural preserves: Williamson Act.

Impact

This legislation aims to modernize the Williamson Act by eliminating outdated provisions, such as the requirement for agricultural preserves to include timberland zoning to meet the 100-acre minimum. It also requires that local governing bodies establish clearer rules for contract administration and the complications that arise from partial cancellations of such contracts. These changes should facilitate better management of agricultural land and potentially encourage more contracts under the Williamson Act, thereby fostering land conservation efforts.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1564, known as the Agricultural Preserves: Williamson Act, amends various sections of the California Government Code, the Public Resources Code, the Revenue and Taxation Code, and the Water Code. The bill seeks to modify and clarify the regulations surrounding agricultural preserves, specifically those governed under the Williamson Act, enacted to limit the use of agricultural land in designated areas. The amendments focus on streamlining administrative procedures for local governments while maintaining the essence of agricultural land preservation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1564 appears generally supportive, focusing on the positive impacts of increased clarity and efficiency in managing agricultural lands under the Williamson Act. Supporters argue that simplifying processes for municipalities will enhance local governance capabilities, aiding in land conservation. However, there are concerns from certain community stakeholders about the potential marginalization of specific local criteria that reflect community values in land use decisions.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention arises from the bill's provisions regarding the rescission of contracts. While it seeks to allow for mutual agreement in rescinding portions of contracts, there is concern about the implications this may have on existing land use agreements and the potential for misuse. Critics worry that loosening restrictions could lead to increased development pressures in agricultural zones, undermining the core intent of the Williamson Act to protect agricultural land.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1156

Solar-use easements: suspension of Williamson Act contracts: terms of easement: termination.

CA SB732

General plan: agricultural land.

CA SB574

Agricultural preserves: Williamson Act.

CA AB2964

Agricultural land conservation: California Farmland Conservancy Program Act.

CA AB925

Williamson Act: farmland security and conservation zones.

CA SB435

Williamson Act: payments to local governments.