Developmental services: integrated competitive employment.
By removing the requirement for a demonstration project and extending the effective provisions indefinitely, AB 1607 makes significant strides in ensuring that individuals have access to tailored supports that cater to their specific employment goals. It enhances the focus on consumer choice by allowing for individualized service design based on the individual program plan (IPP). Furthermore, the bill encourages the development of community-based vocational services, aiming to improve employment readiness and social skills while building a network of community opportunities.
Assembly Bill 1607, introduced by Assembly Member Frazier, aims to enhance employment opportunities for individuals with developmental disabilities by amending the Welfare and Institutions Code. This bill seeks to implement provisions that allow individuals in supported employment or work activity programs to utilize tailored day services alongside their existing programs to achieve integrated competitive employment goals. The legislative intent behind this bill aligns with the Employment First Policy, which prioritizes accessible employment opportunities for individuals with developmental disabilities, irrespective of the severity of their conditions.
The sentiment around AB 1607 is largely positive among supporters who view the enhancements as a necessary evolution in how state services are delivered to individuals with developmental disabilities. Proponents argue that the focus on tailored services promotes greater autonomy and integration within the community. However, there may also be concerns regarding the implementation of these services and the adequacy of resources to meet the increased demands for individualized support.
One notable point of contention is the potential strain on regional centers which may face challenges as they adjust to the new requirements for service design and delivery. Questions may arise about the effectiveness of these tailored day services in improving employment outcomes and whether the state is adequately prepared to support this transition. The emphasis on community-based vocational development services could lead to varying levels of implementation success across different regions, potentially affecting the consistency of service availability.