California Coastal Commission: ex parte communications: disclosure.
Impact
The proposed changes have the potential to significantly impact state laws governing the California Coastal Commission. By requiring more stringent disclosure procedures about ex parte communications, the bill reinforces transparency and accountability for decisions made by the Commission. Given that the California Coastal Act governs important issues related to coastal development and conservation, enhancing disclosure requirements helps to ensure that all stakeholders are informed and can participate effectively in public hearings concerning coastal resources.
Summary
Assembly Bill No. 1642, introduced by Assembly Member Caballero, seeks to amend Section 30324 of the Public Resources Code concerning the California Coastal Commission. The bill enhances the existing requirements for disclosure of ex parte communications by the Commission members or interested persons. Specifically, it mandates that any ex parte communication must be disclosed to the executive director within a week of the communication, or during the next commission hearing held within that timeframe. This amendment aims to improve transparency in the decision-making process of the Coastal Commission regarding coastal resource management.
Contention
While proponents of AB 1642 argue that the bill will increase public trust in the regulatory process by ensuring that decisions about coastal resources are made transparently, some critics may contend that overly stringent disclosure requirements could hinder timely communication and collaboration among stakeholders involved in coastal management. There may be concerns that such regulations could create bureaucratic delays or discourage individuals from engaging in candid discussions with commission members, potentially impacting the effectiveness of the Commission's work.
Coastal resources: California Coastal Act of 1976: industrial developments: oil and gas developments: refineries: petrochemical facilities: offshore wind.