California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1773 Compare Versions

Version 1 (Old)

Version 2 (New)

Old	New		Differences
1		-	Assembly Bill No. ~~1773 CHAPTER 67~~ An act relating to the payment of claims against the state, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. ~~[ Approved by Governor July 09, 2018. Filed with Secretary of State July 09, 2018. ]~~ LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1773, Committee on Appropriations. Claims against the state.Existing law generally requires the Attorney General to pay certain judgments against the state.This bill would appropriate $11,095,000 from the General Fund to the Attorney General to pay judgments against the state, as specified.This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.Digest Key Vote: 2/3 Appropriation: YES Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. (a) The sum of eleven million ninety-five thousand dollars ($11,095,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Attorney General in accordance with the following schedule:(1) The sum of one hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000) to pay the settlement in Alameda County Superior Court Case Cervantez v. Becerra, RG17848408.(2) The sum of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) to pay the settlement in Sacramento County Superior Court Case Amado Onate v. James L. Pulley, Case No. 34-2016-00191904.(3) The sum of nine hundred fifty-five thousand dollars ($955,000) to pay the settlement in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case Robert M. Mallano v. John Chiang, et al., BC533770.(b) Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts actually required for the payment of these claims shall revert to the General Fund within 45 days after final payment is made.SEC. 2. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:In order to pay judgment and settlement claims against the state and end hardship to claimants as quickly as possible, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
	1	+	Enrolled July 03, 2018 Passed IN Senate July 02, 2018 Passed IN Assembly May 25, 2018 Amended IN Assembly May 21, 2018 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1773Introduced by Committee on Appropriations (Assembly Members Gonzalez Fletcher (Chair), Bigelow (Vice Chair), Bloom, Bonta, Brough, Calderon, Chau, Fong, Friedman, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Obernolte, and Reyes)January 04, 2018 An act relating to the payment of claims against the state, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1773, Committee on Appropriations. Claims against the state.Existing law generally requires the Attorney General to pay certain judgments against the state.This bill would appropriate $11,095,000 from the General Fund to the Attorney General to pay judgments against the state, as specified.This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.Digest Key Vote: 2/3 Appropriation: YES Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. (a) The sum of eleven million ninety-five thousand dollars ($11,095,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Attorney General in accordance with the following schedule:(1) The sum of one hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000) to pay the settlement in Alameda County Superior Court Case Cervantez v. Becerra, RG17848408.(2) The sum of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) to pay the settlement in Sacramento County Superior Court Case Amado Onate v. James L. Pulley, Case No. 34-2016-00191904.(3) The sum of nine hundred fifty-five thousand dollars ($955,000) to pay the settlement in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case Robert M. Mallano v. John Chiang, et al., BC533770.(b) Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts actually required for the payment of these claims shall revert to the General Fund within 45 days after final payment is made.SEC. 2. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:In order to pay judgment and settlement claims against the state and end hardship to claimants as quickly as possible, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
2	2
3		-	Assembly Bill No. 1773 CHAPTER 67 An act relating to the payment of claims against the state, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. [ Approved by Governor July 09, 2018. Filed with Secretary of State July 09, 2018. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1773, Committee on Appropriations. Claims against the state.Existing law generally requires the Attorney General to pay certain judgments against the state.This bill would appropriate $11,095,000 from the General Fund to the Attorney General to pay judgments against the state, as specified.This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.Digest Key Vote: 2/3 Appropriation: YES Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO
	3	+	Enrolled July 03, 2018 Passed IN Senate July 02, 2018 Passed IN Assembly May 25, 2018 Amended IN Assembly May 21, 2018 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1773Introduced by Committee on Appropriations (Assembly Members Gonzalez Fletcher (Chair), Bigelow (Vice Chair), Bloom, Bonta, Brough, Calderon, Chau, Fong, Friedman, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Obernolte, and Reyes)January 04, 2018 An act relating to the payment of claims against the state, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1773, Committee on Appropriations. Claims against the state.Existing law generally requires the Attorney General to pay certain judgments against the state.This bill would appropriate $11,095,000 from the General Fund to the Attorney General to pay judgments against the state, as specified.This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.Digest Key Vote: 2/3 Appropriation: YES Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO
	4	+
	5	+	Enrolled July 03, 2018 Passed IN Senate July 02, 2018 Passed IN Assembly May 25, 2018 Amended IN Assembly May 21, 2018
	6	+
	7	+	Enrolled July 03, 2018
	8	+	Passed IN Senate July 02, 2018
	9	+	Passed IN Assembly May 25, 2018
	10	+	Amended IN Assembly May 21, 2018
	11	+
	12	+	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION
4	13
5	14		Assembly Bill No. 1773
6		-	CHAPTER 67
	15	+
	16	+	Introduced by Committee on Appropriations (Assembly Members Gonzalez Fletcher (Chair), Bigelow (Vice Chair), Bloom, Bonta, Brough, Calderon, Chau, Fong, Friedman, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Obernolte, and Reyes)January 04, 2018
	17	+
	18	+	Introduced by Committee on Appropriations (Assembly Members Gonzalez Fletcher (Chair), Bigelow (Vice Chair), Bloom, Bonta, Brough, Calderon, Chau, Fong, Friedman, Gallagher, Eduardo Garcia, Obernolte, and Reyes)
	19	+	January 04, 2018
7	20
8	21		An act relating to the payment of claims against the state, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.
9		-
10		-	[ Approved by Governor July 09, 2018. Filed with Secretary of State July 09, 2018. ]
11	22
12	23		LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
13	24
14	25		## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
15	26
16	27		AB 1773, Committee on Appropriations. Claims against the state.
17	28
18	29		Existing law generally requires the Attorney General to pay certain judgments against the state.This bill would appropriate $11,095,000 from the General Fund to the Attorney General to pay judgments against the state, as specified.This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
19	30
20	31		Existing law generally requires the Attorney General to pay certain judgments against the state.
21	32
22	33		This bill would appropriate $11,095,000 from the General Fund to the Attorney General to pay judgments against the state, as specified.
23	34
24	35		This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
25	36
26	37		## Digest Key
27	38
28	39		## Bill Text
29	40
30	41		The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. (a) The sum of eleven million ninety-five thousand dollars ($11,095,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Attorney General in accordance with the following schedule:(1) The sum of one hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000) to pay the settlement in Alameda County Superior Court Case Cervantez v. Becerra, RG17848408.(2) The sum of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) to pay the settlement in Sacramento County Superior Court Case Amado Onate v. James L. Pulley, Case No. 34-2016-00191904.(3) The sum of nine hundred fifty-five thousand dollars ($955,000) to pay the settlement in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case Robert M. Mallano v. John Chiang, et al., BC533770.(b) Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts actually required for the payment of these claims shall revert to the General Fund within 45 days after final payment is made.SEC. 2. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:In order to pay judgment and settlement claims against the state and end hardship to claimants as quickly as possible, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
31	42
32	43		The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
33	44
34	45		## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
35	46
36	47		SECTION 1. (a) The sum of eleven million ninety-five thousand dollars ($11,095,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Attorney General in accordance with the following schedule:(1) The sum of one hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000) to pay the settlement in Alameda County Superior Court Case Cervantez v. Becerra, RG17848408.(2) The sum of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) to pay the settlement in Sacramento County Superior Court Case Amado Onate v. James L. Pulley, Case No. 34-2016-00191904.(3) The sum of nine hundred fifty-five thousand dollars ($955,000) to pay the settlement in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case Robert M. Mallano v. John Chiang, et al., BC533770.(b) Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts actually required for the payment of these claims shall revert to the General Fund within 45 days after final payment is made.
37	48
38	49		SECTION 1. (a) The sum of eleven million ninety-five thousand dollars ($11,095,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Attorney General in accordance with the following schedule:(1) The sum of one hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000) to pay the settlement in Alameda County Superior Court Case Cervantez v. Becerra, RG17848408.(2) The sum of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) to pay the settlement in Sacramento County Superior Court Case Amado Onate v. James L. Pulley, Case No. 34-2016-00191904.(3) The sum of nine hundred fifty-five thousand dollars ($955,000) to pay the settlement in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case Robert M. Mallano v. John Chiang, et al., BC533770.(b) Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts actually required for the payment of these claims shall revert to the General Fund within 45 days after final payment is made.
39	50
40	51		SECTION 1. (a) The sum of eleven million ninety-five thousand dollars ($11,095,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to the Attorney General in accordance with the following schedule:
41	52
42	53		### SECTION 1.
43	54
44	55		(1) The sum of one hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000) to pay the settlement in Alameda County Superior Court Case Cervantez v. Becerra, RG17848408.
45	56
46	57		(2) The sum of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) to pay the settlement in Sacramento County Superior Court Case Amado Onate v. James L. Pulley, Case No. 34-2016-00191904.
47	58
48	59		(3) The sum of nine hundred fifty-five thousand dollars ($955,000) to pay the settlement in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case Robert M. Mallano v. John Chiang, et al., BC533770.
49	60
50	61		(b) Any funds appropriated in excess of the amounts actually required for the payment of these claims shall revert to the General Fund within 45 days after final payment is made.
51	62
52	63		SEC. 2. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:In order to pay judgment and settlement claims against the state and end hardship to claimants as quickly as possible, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
53	64
54	65		SEC. 2. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:In order to pay judgment and settlement claims against the state and end hardship to claimants as quickly as possible, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.
55	66
56	67		SEC. 2. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
57	68
58	69		### SEC. 2.
59	70
60	71		In order to pay judgment and settlement claims against the state and end hardship to claimants as quickly as possible, it is necessary for this act to take effect immediately.