California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1780

Introduced
1/4/18  
Refer
1/22/18  
Refer
1/22/18  
Report Pass
2/20/18  
Refer
2/21/18  
Refer
2/21/18  
Report Pass
3/21/18  
Report Pass
3/21/18  
Refer
3/21/18  
Refer
3/21/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/21/18  
Refer
6/21/18  
Refer
6/21/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Refer
8/6/18  

Caption

Importation of diseased dogs and cats.

Impact

The bill's implementation will amend the existing Health and Safety Code, creating new protocols for evaluating the potential risks associated with imported animals. By establishing a systematic approach to monitoring outbreaks and taking preventive actions, AB 1780 aims to mitigate risks that could lead to disease transmission to the public. Moreover, the bill introduces civil penalties for violations, thus reinforcing compliance with health and safety standards in animal importation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1780, introduced by Assembly Member Maienschein, aims to strengthen California's capacity to safeguard public health by regulating the importation of dogs and cats that may carry communicable diseases. Specifically, the bill empowers the State Public Health Officer to investigate reports of disease outbreaks linked to animal imports and to enact measures to prevent potential public health risks. This includes the authority to prohibit importation of animals deemed to pose a health threat based on investigations and findings related to contagious diseases from other states.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 1780 appears positive among public health advocates and officers who see it as a proactive measure to protect community health. The provision to impose penalties may also be viewed as a necessary deterrent against irresponsible practices in animal importation. However, there may be concerns from animal rights groups or breeders regarding the potential overreach of governmental powers and the implications for legitimate animal trade.

Contention

Notable points of contention stem from the balance between public health safety and the rights of individuals involved in animal trade. Potential arguments against the bill include fears of excessive governmental authority when determining which animals can be imported and the possible economic impacts on breeders and pet businesses who adhere to existing regulations. Critics might also raise concerns that the criteria for issuing prohibitions could be poorly defined, leading to arbitrary decisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OR SB841

Relating to tribal public health data.

CA AB262

Local health officers: communicable diseases.

DE HB242

An Act To Amend Title 16 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Hospital Visitation Policy.

CA AB1711

Homeless populations: disease outbreak.

HI HB1226

Relating To Violation Of Privacy.

HI SB156

Relating To Violation Of Privacy.

IL HB3503

MEDICAL PATIENT RIGHTS

HI HB1869

Relating To Violation Of Privacy.