California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1794

Introduced
1/9/18  
Introduced
1/9/18  
Refer
1/22/18  
Report Pass
5/10/18  
Report Pass
5/10/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Enrolled
6/25/18  
Enrolled
6/25/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Passed
7/9/18  

Caption

Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency: Southern California Water Company.

Impact

By amending the governance structure of the Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency, AB 1794 enhances local control over groundwater management. The bill introduces provisions for inviting a community facilities district resident director, ensuring that the voice of local stakeholders, particularly those with vested interests in groundwater conservation, is represented. This legislative change aims to improve decision-making processes related to groundwater management activities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1794 modifies the Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency Act, specifically addressing the governance structure of the agency. The bill removes the requirement for one director to be a representative of the Southern California Water Company. Instead, it allows the board of directors to appoint a director who is more suited to the community's needs. This change reflects a move towards localized control in groundwater management within California, particularly beneficial for stakeholders engaged in water conservation activities in the area.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding AB 1794 appears to be positive among local stakeholders who support increased community representation in water management policies. Supporters argue that local engagement will lead to more responsive and effective groundwater management. However, some concerns may arise regarding the potential implications for existing water governance frameworks and the logistical aspects of implementing the new governance structure.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 1794 include the implications of removing the Southern California Water Company's mandated representation on the board. Critics may express worry that this could lead to power dynamics favoring local interests at the expense of broader regulatory oversight traditionally provided by larger entities. Additionally, the qualifications for the community facilities district resident director may spark debate over appropriate representation and community engagement in the decision-making process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB634

Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency.

CA SB372

San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Groundwater Sustainability Agency.

CA AB1044

Tulare Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency Act.

CA SB1084

Mono County Tri-Valley Groundwater Management District.

AZ SB1558

Watershed health; survey; use

AZ HB2522

Watershed health; use; survey

AZ HB2480

Watershed health; use; survey

AZ HB2357

Watershed health; use; survey