California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1794

Introduced
1/9/18  
Introduced
1/9/18  
Refer
1/22/18  
Report Pass
5/10/18  
Report Pass
5/10/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Enrolled
6/25/18  
Enrolled
6/25/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Chaptered
7/9/18  
Passed
7/9/18  

Caption

Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency: Southern California Water Company.

Impact

By amending the governance structure of the Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency, AB 1794 enhances local control over groundwater management. The bill introduces provisions for inviting a community facilities district resident director, ensuring that the voice of local stakeholders, particularly those with vested interests in groundwater conservation, is represented. This legislative change aims to improve decision-making processes related to groundwater management activities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1794 modifies the Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency Act, specifically addressing the governance structure of the agency. The bill removes the requirement for one director to be a representative of the Southern California Water Company. Instead, it allows the board of directors to appoint a director who is more suited to the community's needs. This change reflects a move towards localized control in groundwater management within California, particularly beneficial for stakeholders engaged in water conservation activities in the area.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding AB 1794 appears to be positive among local stakeholders who support increased community representation in water management policies. Supporters argue that local engagement will lead to more responsive and effective groundwater management. However, some concerns may arise regarding the potential implications for existing water governance frameworks and the logistical aspects of implementing the new governance structure.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 1794 include the implications of removing the Southern California Water Company's mandated representation on the board. Critics may express worry that this could lead to power dynamics favoring local interests at the expense of broader regulatory oversight traditionally provided by larger entities. Additionally, the qualifications for the community facilities district resident director may spark debate over appropriate representation and community engagement in the decision-making process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB315

Groundwater: groundwater sustainability agencies: probationary basins.

CA AB828

Sustainable groundwater management: managed wetlands.

CA AB3084

Groundwater basin management.

CA AB1563

Groundwater sustainability agency: groundwater extraction permit: verification.

CA SB1156

Groundwater sustainability agencies: conflicts of interest: financial interest disclosures.

CA AB560

Sustainable Groundwater Management Act: groundwater adjudication.

CA AB1597

Water quality: California-Mexico cross-border watersheds.

CA SB366

The California Water Plan: long-term supply targets.

CA AB2799

Sustainable groundwater management: small farms: fees.

CA AB2079

Groundwater extraction: large-diameter, high-capacity water wells: permits.

Similar Bills

CA SB634

Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency.

CA SB372

San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Groundwater Sustainability Agency.

CA AB568

Tule East Groundwater Sustainability Agency Act.

CA AB1044

Tule East Groundwater Sustainability Agency Act.

CA SB1084

Mono County Tri-Valley Groundwater Management District.