Building codes: earthquake safety: immediate occupancy standard.
If enacted, AB 1857 would significantly affect the state's building codes, particularly for nonresidential structures. The establishment of a functional recovery standard could involve enforceable requirements that would ensure buildings maintain their capacity to support necessary functions after an earthquake. These provisions would aim to minimize downtime and restoration costs, addressing the economic impacts of seismic events. This legislative change reflects California's ongoing commitment to enhancing public safety in earthquake-prone regions.
Assembly Bill 1857, introduced by Assembly Member Nazarian, aims to enhance earthquake safety in California by establishing a 'functional recovery' standard for building codes. The bill mandates the California Building Standards Commission to form a working group that includes state agencies, construction industry representatives, and insurance entities, with the goal of determining whether such a standard is feasible for various building occupancy classifications. By July 1, 2022, this working group is tasked with investigating the practical means for implementing these standards and advising state agencies on how to proceed, including estimating costs for compliance with such regulations.
The reception of AB 1857 appears to be generally positive among those concerned with public safety, particularly related to earthquake resilience. Supporters highlight the importance of adopting modern standards that go beyond mere compliance with existing building codes, aiming for buildings that are not only safe but functional immediately following a seismic event. However, some concerns may arise regarding the implications for construction costs and regulatory burdens on building owners and developers, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that considers both safety and economic feasibility.
Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may arise regarding the specific nature and implementation of the proposed standards. Critics could argue that the mandates could impose excessive costs on builders, potentially leading to pushback from the construction industry. Additionally, discussions may focus on determining which occupancy classifications will be subject to these new standards and the efficacy of voluntary versus mandatory approaches in achieving the desired safety outcomes.