California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1930

Introduced
1/24/18  
Refer
2/5/18  
Refer
2/5/18  
Report Pass
4/17/18  
Report Pass
4/17/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Report Pass
6/6/18  
Report Pass
6/6/18  
Refer
6/6/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Report Pass
7/3/18  
Report Pass
7/3/18  
Refer
7/3/18  
Refer
7/3/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Chaptered
9/29/18  
Chaptered
9/29/18  
Passed
9/29/18  

Caption

Foster care.

Impact

The modifications introduced by AB 1930 seem to enhance the ability of social services to respond rapidly to the needs of children within the foster care system. By adjusting placement protocols, local agencies can act more quickly during emergencies, potentially improving outcomes for children who require immediate safety. Moreover, the bill's alterations to the Kin-GAP program broaden access for caregivers, recognizing the vital role that relatives play in providing stable, supportive environments for children in need.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1930, authored by Mark Stone, focuses on amendments related to foster care in California. The bill aims to streamline procedures concerning the placement and care of dependent children, addressing various provisions within the Family Code and the Welfare and Institutions Codes. Key changes include adjustments to the emergency placement regulations, allowing more flexibility in placing children without a 14-day notice in certain circumstances. Additionally, the bill expands eligibility criteria for the Kinship Guardian Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) program, ensuring that eligible guardians can receive necessary financial support.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1930 has generally been positive, with many stakeholders in child welfare advocating for the changes as necessary and beneficial. Proponents view the bill as a means to improve child welfare outcomes, especially in urgent situations where timely placement is crucial. Critics have raised concerns regarding the implications of waiving certain notice requirements, fearing that it might limit the rights of biological parents or guardians in the processes concerning their children.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the bill’s approach to confidentiality. As it imposes limitations on public access to meetings and documents pertaining to foster care proceedings, some members of the public and advocacy groups have expressed apprehension about the transparency of the foster care system. They argue that while protecting sensitive information is important, it is equally vital to maintain oversight and accountability within child welfare practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB819

Foster care.

CA AB404

Foster care.

CA SB824

Foster care.

CA SB354

Public social services.